Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30729020›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology open

Attitudes towards depression among non-psychiatric physicians in four tertiary centres in Riyadh.

Thamir Aldahmashi, Abdullah Almanea, Abdulaziz Alsaad, Mohamud Mohamud, Irfan Anjum

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mental illness attitudes and knowledge in non-specialist medical doctors working in state and private sectors.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thamir AldahmashiKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AlmaneaKing Abdulaziz Medical City, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AlsaadKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamud MohamudKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia.
Irfan AnjumKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a common mental illness that has a profound impact on an estimated number of 300 million people worldwide. Depression is stigmatised in communities and even physicians, especially, non-psychiatric physicians, which affects depressed patients' care. This study aims to investigate non-psychiatric physicians' attitudes towards depression in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study surveyed 380 participants using Revised Depression Attitude Questionnaire. Non-psychiatric physicians in Riyadh are optimistic and have a positive perspective towards depression. Yet, the majority preferred dealing with physical rather than mental illness. Understanding the attitudes of medical practitioners is important to shape service delivery and assess training needs.

Indexed as

attitudeconfidencedepressionnon-psychiatricphysicianpsychiatryR-DAQRiyadhSaudi Arabiastigmatisation

Identifiers

PMID30729020
PMCPMC6350145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.