Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30729019›Full record

ReviewLupus science & medicine2019

10 most important contemporary challenges in the management of SLE.

Renaud Felten, Flora Sagez, Pierre-Edouard Gavand, Thierry Martin, Anne-Sophie Korganow, Christelle Sordet, Rose-Marie Javier, Pauline Soulas-Sprauel, Marianne Rivière, Florence Scher and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lupus science & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Cytokine Storm.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Lupus clinical trials and the promise of future therapies.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Renaud Felten *Service de rhumatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-4032
Flora Sagez *Service de rhumatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Pierre-Edouard GavandCentre National de Références des Maladies Systémiques et Autoimmunes Rares Est Sud-Ouest (RESO)-LUPUS, Strasbourg, France.
Thierry MartinCentre National de Références des Maladies Systémiques et Autoimmunes Rares Est Sud-Ouest (RESO)-LUPUS, Strasbourg, France.
Anne-Sophie KorganowCentre National de Références des Maladies Systémiques et Autoimmunes Rares Est Sud-Ouest (RESO)-LUPUS, Strasbourg, France.
Christelle SordetService de rhumatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Rose-Marie JavierService de rhumatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Pauline Soulas-SprauelCentre National de Références des Maladies Systémiques et Autoimmunes Rares Est Sud-Ouest (RESO)-LUPUS, Strasbourg, France.
Marianne RivièreAssociation Française du Lupus et autres Maladies Auto-Immunes (AFL+), France.
Florence ScherService de Pharmacie-Stérilisation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Vincent PoindronCentre National de Références des Maladies Systémiques et Autoimmunes Rares Est Sud-Ouest (RESO)-LUPUS, Strasbourg, France.
Aurélien GuffroyCentre National de Références des Maladies Systémiques et Autoimmunes Rares Est Sud-Ouest (RESO)-LUPUS, Strasbourg, France.
Laurent ArnaudService de rhumatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From a 1-year survival of less than 50% before the discovery of glucocorticoids to over 90% at 10 years in most dedicated centres, the spectrum of SLE has profoundly evolved. Despite this improvement, several major challenges currently remain. The aim of this review is to analyse what are, according to us, the 10 most important contemporary challenges in the management of SLE. Among those are the need to treat to target to favour disease remission (or low disease activity), limit the use of glucocorticoids, derive more comprehensive tools for the evaluation of disease activity, develop more effective drugs (yielding successful trials), dissect the heterogeneity of the disease both at the molecular and genetic levels, identify relevant biomarkers for individualised treatment, manage fertility and pregnancy, tackle comorbidities such as cardiovascular risk, the prevention of infections and osteoporosis, improve the network of care (from the patients' perspective), and favour a holistic approach (integrating fatigue, adherence to treatment, physical activity). Altogether, these 10 contemporary challenges in SLE may be considered as a roadmap for those involved in the daily care of patients with SLE, as well as for researchers who may wish to contribute to an improved management of this rare and complex disease.

Indexed as

damagedisease activityglucocorticoidsreviewsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID30729019
PMCPMC6340557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.