ArticleJournal of tissue engineering
Three-dimensional printing of a patient-specific engineered nasal cartilage for augmentative rhinoplasty.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Application of Cartilage Tissue Engineering with Cell-Laden Hydrogel in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Scaffolding for Nasal Cartilage Defects: A Systematic Review.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Bioengineered nasal septum implant with 3D-printed silicone and chondrocyte-seeded fibrin hydrogel.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- The Usefulness of 3D-printed Nasal Implant Based on Virtual Plastic Simulation on Asian Rhinoplasty: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- ChondrocytesFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- 3D Printing in Nasal Reconstruction: Application-Based Evidence on What Works, When, and Why.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering in Multilayer Tissue Regeneration.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Volumetric Additive Manufacturing for Cell Printing: Bridging Industry Adaptation and Regulatory Frontiers.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Human Septal Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Current Methodologies and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The current techniques in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty: a comprehensive review.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2024Review
- Decellularized extracellular matrix biomaterials for regenerative therapies: Advances, challenges and clinical prospects.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Impact of mechanical engineering innovations in biomedical advancements.In vitro models · 2024Review
- Recent advances in 3D bioprinted cartilage-mimicking constructs for applications in tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Bio-inspired microfluidics: A review.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Review
- Article
- Investigation on Filaments for 3D Printing of Nasal Septum Cartilage Implant.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Cartilage 3D bioprinting for rhinoplasty using adipose-derived stem cells as seed cells: Review and recent advances.Cell proliferation · 2023Review
- Biomaterials-based additive manufacturing for customized bioengineering in management of otolaryngology: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Progress of 3D Printing Techniques for Nasal Cartilage Regeneration.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2022Review
- Bringing hydrogel-based craniofacial therapies to the clinic.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous cartilages or synthetic nasal implants have been utilized in augmentative rhinoplasty to reconstruct the nasal shape for therapeutic and cosmetic purposes. Autologous cartilage is considered to be an ideal graft, but has drawbacks, such as limited cartilage source, requirements of additional surgery for obtaining autologous cartilage, and donor site morbidity. In contrast, synthetic nasal implants are abundantly available but have low biocompatibility than the autologous cartilages. Moreover, the currently used nasal cartilage grafts involve additional reshaping processes, by meticulous manual carving during surgery to fit the diverse nose shape of each patient. The final shapes of the manually tailored implants are highly dependent on the surgeons' proficiency and often result in patient dissatisfaction and even undesired separation of the implant. This study describes a new process of rhinoplasty, which integrates three-dimensional printing and tissue engineering approaches. We established a serial procedure based on computer-aided design to generate a three-dimensional model of customized nasal implant, and the model was fabricated through three-dimensional printing. An engineered nasal cartilage implant was generated by injecting cartilage-derived hydrogel containing human adipose-derived stem cells into the implant containing the octahedral interior architecture. We observed remarkable expression levels of chondrogenic markers from the human adipose-derived stem cells grown in the engineered nasal cartilage with the cartilage-derived hydrogel. In addition, the engineered nasal cartilage, which was implanted into mouse subcutaneous region, exhibited maintenance of the exquisite shape and structure, and striking formation of the cartilaginous tissues for 12 weeks. We expect that the developed process, which combines computer-aided design, three-dimensional printing, and tissue-derived hydrogel, would be beneficial in generating implants of other types of tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.