Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728935›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering

Pulp-dentin regeneration: current approaches and challenges.

Chanyong Jung, Sangwan Kim, Taeuk Sun, Yong-Bum Cho, Minju Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Enriched advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus gold nanoparticles againstJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chanyong JungDepartment of Dentistry, Aerospace Medical Center, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6533-4787
Sangwan KimDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
Taeuk SunDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
Yong-Bum ChoDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
Minju SongDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-2359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative endodontic procedures for immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis confer biological advantages such as tooth homeostasis, enhanced immune defense system, and a functional pulp-dentin complex, in addition to clinical advantages such as the facilitation of root development. Currently, this procedure is recognized as a paradigm shift from restoration using materials to regenerate pulp-dentin tissues. Many studies have been conducted with regard to stem/progenitor cells, scaffolds, and biomolecules, associated with pulp tissue engineering. However, preclinical and clinical studies have evidently revealed several drawbacks in the current clinical approach to revascularization that may lead to unfavorable outcomes. Therefore, our review examines the challenges encountered under clinical conditions and summarizes current research findings in an attempt to provide direction for transition from basic research to clinical practice.

Indexed as

pulp regenerationRegenerative endodonticsrevascularizationtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30728935
PMCPMC6351713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.