ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2019
Burst synchronization in a scale-free neuronal network with inhibitory spike-timing-dependent plasticity.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Synchronization and oscillation behaviors of excitatory and inhibitory populations with spike-timing-dependent plasticity.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Detecting synaptic connections in neural systems using compressive sensing.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022Article
- Application of expert system and LSTM in extracting index of synaptic plasticity.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
- Neural mechanism of visual information degradation from retina to V1 area.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
- Epileptic seizures in a heterogeneous excitatory network with short-term plasticity.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
- Induction and propagation of transient synchronous activity in neural networks endowed with short-term plasticity.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
- The Study for Synchronization between Two Coupled FitzHugh-Nagumo Neurons Based on the Laplace Transform and the Adomian Decomposition Method.Neural plasticity · 2021Article
- A Synchronization Criterion for Two Hindmarsh-Rose Neurons with Linear and Nonlinear Coupling Functions Based on the Laplace Transform Method.Neural plasticity · 2021Article
- Effect of interpopulation spike-timing-dependent plasticity on synchronized rhythms in neuronal networks with inhibitory and excitatory populations.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2020Article
- Effects of network topologies on stochastic resonance in feedforward neural network.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2020Article
- Bipolar oscillations between positive and negative mood states in a computational model of Basal Ganglia.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2020Article
- Noise suppression ability and its mechanism analysis of scale-free spiking neural network under white Gaussian noise.PloS one · 2020Article
- The beta oscillation conditions in a simplified basal ganglia network.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We are concerned about burst synchronization (BS), related to neural information processes in health and disease, in the Barabási-Albert scale-free network (SFN) composed of inhibitory bursting Hindmarsh-Rose neurons. This inhibitory neuronal population has adaptive dynamic synaptic strengths governed by the inhibitory spike-timing-dependent plasticity (iSTDP). In previous works without considering iSTDP, BS was found to appear in a range of noise intensities for fixed synaptic inhibition strengths. In contrast, in our present work, we take into consideration iSTDP and investigate its effect on BS by varying the noise intensity. Our new main result is to find occurrence of a Matthew effect in inhibitory synaptic plasticity: good BS gets better via LTD, while bad BS get worse via LTP. This kind of Matthew effect in inhibitory synaptic plasticity is in contrast to that in excitatory synaptic plasticity where good (bad) synchronization gets better (worse) via LTP (LTD). We note that, due to inhibition, the roles of LTD and LTP in inhibitory synaptic plasticity are reversed in comparison with those in excitatory synaptic plasticity. Moreover, emergences of LTD and LTP of synaptic inhibition strengths are intensively investigated via a microscopic method based on the distributions of time delays between the pre- and the post-synaptic burst onset times. Finally, in the presence of iSTDP we investigate the effects of network architecture on BS by varying the symmetric attachment degree
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.