ReviewSeminars in hearing2019
Evidence-Based Interventions for Adult Aural Rehabilitation: That Was Then, This Is Now.
Review in Seminars in hearing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Understanding engagement with digital health interventions designed for adults with hearing loss and tinnitus: a mixed-method systematic review.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Digital Interventions for First-Time Hearing Aid Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Effectiveness.Trends in hearingPooled it
- Hearing Rehabilitation With a Chat-Based Mobile Auditory Training Program in Experienced Hearing Aid Users: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Trial
- "Smashing through barriers"? A multimodal critical discourse analysis of media representations of hearing loss and D/deafness.PloS one · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Self-Directed Auditory Rehabilitation in Individuals With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of audiology & otology · 2026Article
- Community-based hearing aid fitting model for adults in low-income communities facilitated by community health workers: a feasibility study.Global health action · 2025Article
- Technologies and Auditory Rehabilitation Beyond Hearing Aids: An Exploratory Systematic Review.Audiology research · 2025Review
- Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Field Testing of the Korean Version of the HEAR-COMMAND Tool: A Self-Rated ICF-Based Questionnaire for Assessing Hearing, Communication, and Conversation Disabilities in Korean-Speaking Populations.Journal of audiology & otology · 2025Article
- Personalizing Auditory Training: Understanding Individual Factors in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.Seminars in hearing · 2025Review
- Potential Roles of Audiologists Supporting Patients' OTC Hearing Aid Journey.Seminars in hearing · 2025Review
- Article
- Mobile Health Hearing Aid Acclimatization and Support Program in Low-Income Communities: Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Remote Technologies to Enhance Service Delivery for Adults: Clinical Research Perspectives.Seminars in hearing · 2023Review
- Is Teleaudiology Achieving Person-Centered Care: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- A Holistic Approach to Addressing Post-Fitting Needs in the Short and Long Term for New Hearing Aid Users.Seminars in hearing · 2022Review
- Guidance on Providing Patient-Centered Care.Seminars in hearing · 2022Review
- Audiologists' Perceptions of Hearing Healthcare Resources and Services in South Africa's Public Healthcare System.Health services insights · 2022Article
- Defining a Patient-Centred Core Outcome Domain Set for the Assessment of Hearing Rehabilitation With Clients and Professionals.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Enhancing Person-Centered Audiologic Rehabilitation: Exploring the Use of an Interview Tool Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for Hearing Loss.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- The feasibility of an m-health educational programme (m2Hear) to improve outcomes in first-time hearing aid users.International journal of audiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
More than a decade after Arthur Boothroyd published "Adult Aural Rehabilitation: What Is It and Does It Work?," the four cornerstones of adult aural rehabilitation are re-examined in terms of research that we and others in the field have undertaken. The focus is on novel advances in high-quality research relating to interventions to support self-management for hearing aids and other listening devices (sensory management), knowledge and skill (instruction), auditory and cognitive training (perceptual training), and motivational engagement (counseling). Much of this new research has a theoretical underpinning (e.g., behavior change theory) to better guide the development and evaluation of interventions, with a focus on self-management and patient-centered approaches. New and emerging technologies that support e- and m-health delivery of interventions provide greater personalization and interactivity to promote self-management of hearing loss. Looking to the future, there remains a requirement for a set of relevant and appropriate outcome measures to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions trialed in clinical studies. There is a continuing need for high-quality evidence, underpinned by contemporary theory, to increase the likelihood that translational adult aural rehabilitation research that aims to benefit patients will be applied in future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.