Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728503›Full record

ArticleNature2019

Discrete attractor dynamics underlies persistent activity in the frontal cortex.

Hidehiko K Inagaki, Lorenzo Fontolan, Sandro Romani, Karel Svoboda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Population geometries in frontal cortex coordinate value-based decisions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lipid Activation of a Thalamic GPCR Extends Working Memory Time-scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hidehiko K InagakiJanelia Research Campus, HHMI, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Lorenzo FontolanJanelia Research Campus, HHMI, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Sandro RomaniJanelia Research Campus, HHMI, Ashburn, VA, USA. romanis@janelia.hhmi.org.
Karel SvobodaJanelia Research Campus, HHMI, Ashburn, VA, USA. svobodak@janelia.hhmi.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term memories link events separated in time, such as past sensation and future actions. Short-term memories are correlated with slow neural dynamics, including selective persistent activity, which can be maintained over seconds. In a delayed response task that requires short-term memory, neurons in the mouse anterior lateral motor cortex (ALM) show persistent activity that instructs future actions. To determine the principles that underlie this persistent activity, here we combined intracellular and extracellular electrophysiology with optogenetic perturbations and network modelling. We show that during the delay epoch, the activity of ALM neurons moved towards discrete end points that correspond to specific movement directions. These end points were robust to transient shifts in ALM activity caused by optogenetic perturbations. Perturbations occasionally switched the population dynamics to the other end point, followed by incorrect actions. Our results show that discrete attractor dynamics underlie short-term memory related to motor planning.

Indexed as

Membrane PotentialsModels, NeurologicalAnimalsMaleMemory, Short-TermMiceMotor CortexMovementNeuronsOptogenetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.