Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728481›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2020

Probabilistic risk assessment for high-end consumers of seafood on the northeastern Gulf coast.

Leah D Stuchal, Makyba K S Charles-Ayinde, Andrew S Kane, Marianne Kozuch, Stephen M Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exposure Assessment of methyl mercury from consumption of fish and seafood in Peninsular Malaysia.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah D StuchalCenter for Environmental and Human Toxicology, Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. lstuchal@ufl.edu.
Makyba K S Charles-AyindeDepartment of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Andrew S KaneDepartment of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Marianne KozuchAnalytical Toxicology Core Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Stephen M RobertsCenter for Environmental and Human Toxicology, Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

Project 3: Seafood Hydrocarbon Residues and Costal Community Health RisksU19ES020683 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI KANE, ANDREW SCOTT · 2011 to 2015
$7.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS U19 ES020683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill (April 20, 2010) caused concern regarding Gulf seafood safety. Communities were skeptical of governmental risk assessments because they did not take into account the higher consumption of seafood along coastal areas. The objective of this study was to perform a probabilistic risk assessment based on the consumption rates of high-end consumers of Gulf seafood. We utilized seafood consumption data from five communities across the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. This study collected finfish, shrimp, blue crab, and oysters from these communities and analyzed their tissues for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). A probabilistic risk assessment was performed using population-specific seafood consumption rates and body weights for commercial fishers, recreational fishers, and a Filipino-American community. For non-cancer effects, 95th percentile hazard quotients for these targeted populations ranged between 1.84E-04 to 5.39E-03 for individual seafood types. The 95th percentile hazard indices for total seafood consumption ranged from 3.45E-03 to 8.41E-03. Based on total seafood consumption, highest hazard indices were modeled for the Filipino-American community followed by commercial and recreational fishers. Despite higher consumption rates, hazard indices for the high-end consumers targeted in this study were two to three orders of magnitude below the regulatory limit of 1.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFishesFood ContaminationGulf of AmericaHumansPetroleum PollutionPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRisk AssessmentSeafoodWater Pollutants, ChemicalPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, Chemicalpolynuclear aromatic hydrocarbonsprobabilistic risk assessmentseafood consumption

Identifiers

PMID30728481
PMCPMC6684874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.