ReviewLeukemia2019
Data mining for mutation-specific targets in acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in Leukemia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status in acute myeloid leukemia from gene expression profiles by machine learning.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Circ-RERE promotes autophagy and immune escape in acute myeloid leukemia involving the miR-128-3p/ZEB1/PD-L1 axis.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Synthetic Tabular Data Generation Under Horizontal Federated Learning Environments in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Case-Based Simulation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Decoding Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Clinician's Guide to Functional Profiling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Antileukemia Activity of Human Natural Killer Cell-Derived Nanomagic Bullets against Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2024Article
- Using published pathway figures in enrichment analysis and machine learning.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Unleashing the Power of Synthetic Lethality: Augmenting Treatment Efficacy through Synergistic Integration with Chemotherapy Drugs.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Human circulating small non-coding RNA signature as a non-invasive biomarker in clinical diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia.Theranostics · 2023Article
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Hematology Management: Current Practices and Future Prospects.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Review
- Machine learning finds new AML subtypes.Blood · 2021Article
- Review
- Application of machine learning in the management of acute myeloid leukemia: current practice and future prospects.Blood advances · 2020Review
- Advances in synthetic lethality for cancer therapy: cellular mechanism and clinical translation.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2020Review
- Successful Anti-CLL1 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Is There Still a Role for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia?Cancers · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three mutation-specific targeted therapies have recently been approved by the FDA for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML): midostaurin for FLT3 mutations, enasidenib for relapsed or refractory cases with IDH2 mutations, and ivosidenib for cases with an IDH1 mutation. Together, these agents offer a mutation-directed treatment approach for up to 45% of de novo adult AML cases, a welcome deluge after a prolonged drought. At the same time, a number of computational tools have recently been developed that promise to further accelerate progress in mutation-specific therapy for AML and other cancers. Technical advances together with comprehensively annotated AML tissue banks have resulted in the availability of large and complex data sets for exploration by the end-user, including (i) microarray gene expression, (ii) exome sequencing, (iii) deep sequencing data of sub-clone heterogeneity, (iv) RNA sequencing of gene expression (bulk and single cell), (v) DNA methylation and chromatin, (vi) and germline quantitative trait loci. Yet few clinicians or experimental hematologists have the time or the training to access or analyze these repositories. This review summarizes the data sets and bioinformatic tools currently available to further the discovery of mutation-specific targets with an emphasis on web-based applications that are open, accessible, user-friendly, and do not require coding experience to navigate. We show examples of how available data can be mined to identify potential targets using synthetic lethality, drug repurposing, epigenetic sub-grouping, and proteomic networks while also highlighting strengths and limitations and the need for superior models for validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.