Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728370›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Repellency Assessment of Nepeta cataria Essential Oils and Isolated Nepetalactones on Aedes aegypti.

William Reichert, Jadrian Ejercito, Tom Guda, Xujun Dong, Qingli Wu, Anandasankar Ray, James E Simon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Via Air or Rhizosphere: The Phytotoxicity ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Veterinary world · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Antimicrobial effects of catnip (Veterinary world · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Investigation of Volatile Iridoid Terpenes inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William ReichertNew Use Agriculture and Natural Plant Products Program, Department of Plant Biology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Jadrian EjercitoDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Tom GudaDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Xujun DongNew Use Agriculture and Natural Plant Products Program, Department of Plant Biology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Qingli WuNew Use Agriculture and Natural Plant Products Program, Department of Plant Biology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Anandasankar RayDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
James E SimonNew Use Agriculture and Natural Plant Products Program, Department of Plant Biology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA. jimsimon@rutgers.edu.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Receptors and Circuits for DEET Detection and Improving RepellentsR01DC014092 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI RAY, ANANDASANKAR · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increased need for improved and affordable insect repellents to reduce transmission of rapidly spreading diseases with high mortality rates. Natural products are often used when DEET cannot be afforded or accessed and when consumers choose not to use a synthetic repellent. The essential oils from two newly bred Nepeta cataria (catnip) plants representing two different chemotypes and their respective isolated nepetalactone isomers were evaluated as mosquito repellents against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes that transmit the Zika and Dengue virus in a one choice landing rate inhibition assay. A dose response curve was generated for each treatment and a time course analysis of repellency was performed over 24 hours with a N. cataria essential oil sample. The results indicate that all essential oil samples and their respective purified nepetalactone isomers were able to achieve greater than 95% repellency. Between two and four hours, the ability to repel more than 95% of the mosquitoes diminished. At the lowest concentrations tested, the nepetalactones and crude essential oil samples were more effective than DEET at reducing the number of mosquito landings.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsCyclopentane MonoterpenesFemaleInsect RepellentsNepetaOils, VolatilePlant OilsPyronesCyclopentane MonoterpenesInsect RepellentsnepetalactoneOils, VolatilePlant OilsPyrones

Identifiers

PMID30728370
PMCPMC6365536
OpenAlexW2938809332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.