Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728340›Full record

Observational studyThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2018

Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Infliximab and Tacrolimus Treatment for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Retrospective Observational Study.

Takafumi Otsuka, Makoto Ooi, Kazutoshi Tobimatsu, Chika Wakahara, Daisuke Watanabe, Soichiro Adachi, Eiichiro Yasutomi, Haruka Yamairi, Yuna Ku, Masaru Yoshida and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takafumi OtsukaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Makoto OoiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kazutoshi TobimatsuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Chika WakaharaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Daisuke WatanabeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Soichiro AdachiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Eiichiro YasutomiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Haruka YamairiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Yuna KuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Masaru YoshidaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Namiko HoshiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Yuzo KodamaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsWhile some studies have shown that IFX and TAC exhibit similar efficacy against UC in the short-term, it is unclear which drug produces better long-term outcomes. In this study, we compared the long-term efficacy of IFX and TAC in patients with moderate to severe UC.

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted from 2009 to 2017. It included patients with no history of IFX or TAC treatment. We analyzed the clinical response and remission rates at 12 and 52 weeks, and colectomy-free and relapse-free survival were evaluated until the end of the study.

resultsAt 12 weeks, 94.4% and 77.8% of the patients in the IFX group (n = 18) had demonstrated clinical responses and clinical remission, respectively, whereas 72.7% of the patients in the TAC group (n = 11) exhibited clinical responses and clinical remission. The clinical response, clinical remission, and colectomy-free rates did not differ significantly between the groups. At 52 weeks, clinical responses and clinical remission had been achieved in 76.5% and 70.6% of the patients both in the IFX group, respectively. In the TAC group, clinical responses and clinical remission were achieved in 50.0% of patients. Relapse-free and colectomy-free survival were estimated significantly better in IFX group evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves.

conclusionThis study indicates that IFX and TAC produce similar short-term outcomes in UC patients, but IFX produces better long-term outcomes than TAC especially with avoidance of colectomy. Our data suggest that IFX therapy may be prioritized over TAC for the treatment of moderate to severe UC.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCalcineurin InhibitorsChildColitis, UlcerativeFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTacrolimusYoung AdultCalcineurin InhibitorsGastrointestinal AgentsInfliximabTacrolimusInfliximabTacrolimusUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID30728340
PMCPMC6347042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.