Observational studyThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2018
Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Infliximab and Tacrolimus Treatment for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Retrospective Observational Study.
Observational study in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Infliximab for patients with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Loss of Response and Need for Dose Escalation of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of tacrolimus therapy in refractory ulcerative colitis compared to infliximab with propensity score matching.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of SB2 (Infliximab Biosimilar) in Adult Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Post-Marketing Surveillance in Korea.Advances in therapy · 2023Observational
- Predictive factors of response to infliximab therapy in Brazilian inflammatory bowel disease patients.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Adalimumab, Infliximab, and Vedolizumab in Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Long-Term Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Referral Center.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2021Article
- Treatment persistence and colectomy-free outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving golimumab or adalimumab: a UK experience.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Efficacy of infliximab, cyclosporine and tacrolimus on ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Article
- Comparative efficacy of antitumor necrosis factor agents and tacrolimus in naïve steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis patients.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsWhile some studies have shown that IFX and TAC exhibit similar efficacy against UC in the short-term, it is unclear which drug produces better long-term outcomes. In this study, we compared the long-term efficacy of IFX and TAC in patients with moderate to severe UC.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted from 2009 to 2017. It included patients with no history of IFX or TAC treatment. We analyzed the clinical response and remission rates at 12 and 52 weeks, and colectomy-free and relapse-free survival were evaluated until the end of the study.
resultsAt 12 weeks, 94.4% and 77.8% of the patients in the IFX group (n = 18) had demonstrated clinical responses and clinical remission, respectively, whereas 72.7% of the patients in the TAC group (n = 11) exhibited clinical responses and clinical remission. The clinical response, clinical remission, and colectomy-free rates did not differ significantly between the groups. At 52 weeks, clinical responses and clinical remission had been achieved in 76.5% and 70.6% of the patients both in the IFX group, respectively. In the TAC group, clinical responses and clinical remission were achieved in 50.0% of patients. Relapse-free and colectomy-free survival were estimated significantly better in IFX group evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves.
conclusionThis study indicates that IFX and TAC produce similar short-term outcomes in UC patients, but IFX produces better long-term outcomes than TAC especially with avoidance of colectomy. Our data suggest that IFX therapy may be prioritized over TAC for the treatment of moderate to severe UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30728340PMC6347042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.