Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728313›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in health sciences2018

Estimation of the Basic Reproduction Number and Vaccination Coverage of Influenza in the United States (2017-18).

Roya Nikbakht, Mohammad Reza Baneshi, Abbas Bahrampour

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in health sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Scientific evidence supports aerosol transmission of SARS-COV-2.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Preparing for the Next Wave of COVID-19: Resilience in the Face of a Spreading Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roya NikbakhtDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Modeling in Health Research Center, Faculty of Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mohammad Reza BaneshiDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Modeling in Health Research Center, Faculty of Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Abbas BahrampourDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Modeling in Health Research Center, Faculty of Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. abahrampour@yahoo.com.
Kerman University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining the epidemic threshold parameter helps health providers calculate the coverage while guiding them in planning the process of vaccination strategy. Since the trend and mechanism of influenza is very similar in different countries, we planned a study with the mentioned goal by using data of US from 2017 to 2018. STUDY

designA secondary study.

methodsR0 and corresponding vaccination coverage are estimated using the national and state-level data of the US from the 40th in 2017 to the 5th week in 2018. Four methods maximum likelihood (ML), exponential growth (EG), time-dependent reproduction numbers (TD), and sequential Bayesian (SB) are used to calculate minimum vaccination coverage. The gamma distribution is considered as the distribution and the generation of time.

resultsThe peak of epidemy in most states has occurred in the 15th week after the beginning of the epidemics. The generation time obey the Gamma distribution with mean and standard deviation of 3.6 and 1.6, respectively, was utilized for the generation time. The R0 (vaccination coverage) equaled 1.94 (48.4%), 1.80 (44.4%), 3.06 (67.3%), and 2.11 (52.6%) for EG, ML, SB, and TD methods at the national level, respectively.

conclusionThe R0 estimations were in the range of 1.8-3.06, indicating that an epidemic has occurred in the US (R0>1). Thus, it is required to vaccinate at least 44.4% to 67.3% to prevent the next epidemics of influenza. The findings of this study assist futures studies to apply disease control by vaccination strategies in order to prevent a national disaster.

Indexed as

Basic Reproduction NumberEpidemicsHealth Services Needs and DemandVaccination CoverageBayes TheoremHumansInfluenza, HumanUnited StatesVaccinationBasic reproduction numberEpidemic threshold parametersInfluenzaVaccination coverage

Identifiers

PMID30728313
PMCPMC6941634
OpenAlexW2897284735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.