Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728296›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Structure-function characterization of an insecticidal protein GNIP1Aa, a member of an MACPF and β-tripod families.

Jelena Zaitseva, Daniel Vaknin, Christian Krebs, James Doroghazi, Sara L Milam, Deepa Balasubramanian, Nicholas B Duck, Joerg Freigang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Partial genomic characterization of Chromobacterium piscinae from India reveals multi drug resistance.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jelena ZaitsevaAgricultural Solutions, BASF, Morrisville, NC 27560; Jelena.zaitseva@agro.basf-se.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3141-4348
Daniel VakninAgricultural Solutions, BASF, Morrisville, NC 27560.
Christian KrebsCrop Science, Bayer AG, 40789 Monheim, Germany.
James DoroghaziCrop Science, Bayer US, Durham, NC 27703.
Sara L MilamAgricultural Solutions, BASF, Morrisville, NC 27560.
Deepa BalasubramanianCrop Science, Bayer AG, 40789 Monheim, Germany.
Nicholas B DuckAgricultural Solutions, BASF, Morrisville, NC 27560.
Joerg FreigangCrop Science, Bayer AG, 40789 Monheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The crystal structure of the Gram-negative insecticidal protein, GNIP1Aa, has been solved at 2.5-Å resolution. The protein consists of two structurally distinct domains, a MACPF (membrane attack complex/PerForin) and a previously uncharacterized type of domain. GNIP1Aa is unique in being a prokaryotic MACPF member to have both its structure and function identified. It was isolated from a

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBacterial ProteinsChromobacteriumColeopteraComplement Membrane Attack ComplexCrystallography, X-RayInsecticidesModels, MolecularPerforinPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsProtein DomainsProtein Structure, TertiaryBacterial ProteinsComplement Membrane Attack ComplexInsecticidesPerforinPore Forming Cytotoxic Proteinscrystal structureinsecticidal proteinMACPFprotein familyβ-tripod domain

Identifiers

PMID30728296
PMCPMC6386698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.