Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728187›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2019

Are more experienced clinicians better able to tolerate uncertainty and manage risks? A vignette study of doctors in three NHS emergency departments in England.

Rebecca Lawton, Olivia Robinson, Rebecca Harrison, Suzanne Mason, Mark Conner, Brad Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Moderators uncertainty tolerance (UT) in healthcare: a systematic review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Patterns of negative trauma laparotomy worldwide: a sub-analysis of a global dataset.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. "With Great Responsibility Comes Great Uncertainty".Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca LawtonInstitute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK r.j.lawton@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5832-402X
Olivia RobinsonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Rebecca HarrisonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Suzanne MasonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mark ConnerSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Brad WilsonAccident and Emergency, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk aversion among junior doctors that manifests as greater intervention (ordering of tests, diagnostic procedures and so on) has been proposed as one of the possible causes for increased pressure in emergency departments (EDs). Here we tested the prediction that doctors with more experience would be more tolerant of uncertainty and therefore less risk-averse in decision making.

methodsIn this cross-sectional, vignette-based study, doctors working in three EDs were asked to complete a questionnaire measuring experience (length of service in EDs), reactions to uncertainty (Gerrity

resultsData from 90 doctors were analysed. Doctors had worked in the ED for between 5 weeks and 21 years. We found a large association between experience and risk aversion so that more experienced clinicians made less risk-averse decisions (r=0.47, p<0.001). We also found a large association between experience and reactions to uncertainty (r=-0.50, p<0.001), with more experienced doctors being much more at ease with uncertainty. Mediation analyses indicated that tolerance of uncertainty partially mediated the relationship between experience and lower risk aversion, explaining about a quarter of the effect.

conclusionWhile we might be tempted to conclude from this research that experience and the ability to tolerate uncertainty lead to positive outcomes for patients (less risk-averse management strategies and higher levels of safety netting), what we are unable to conclude from this design is that these less risk-averse strategies improve patient safety.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingEmergency Service, HospitalState MedicineAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDecision Support Systems, ClinicalEnglandHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePhysiciansRisk AssessmentSafety ManagementUncertaintycognitive biasesdecision makingemergency departmentpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID30728187
PMCPMC6560462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.