Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728060›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Large-cage assessment of a transgenic sex-ratio distortion strain on populations of an African malaria vector.

Luca Facchinelli, Ace R North, C Matilda Collins, Miriam Menichelli, Tania Persampieri, Alessandro Bucci, Roberta Spaccapelo, Andrea Crisanti, Mark Q Benedict

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ExploitingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Luca FacchinelliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Ace R NorthDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
C Matilda CollinsCentre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, 16-18 Princes Gardens, London, SW7 1NE, UK.
Miriam MenichelliPolo di Genomica Genetica e Biologia, Via mazzieri 3, 05100, Terni, Italy.
Tania PersampieriPolo di Genomica Genetica e Biologia, Via mazzieri 3, 05100, Terni, Italy.
Alessandro BucciPolo di Genomica Genetica e Biologia, Via mazzieri 3, 05100, Terni, Italy.
Roberta SpaccapeloDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, 06132, Perugia, Italy.
Andrea CrisantiDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building Imperial College Road South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Mark Q BenedictCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. mqbenedict@yahoo.com.
Polo d’Innovazione di Genomica · ITImperial College London · GBUniversity of Perugia · ITCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel transgenic mosquito control methods require progressively more realistic evaluation. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of a transgene that causes a male-bias sex ratio on Anopheles gambiae target populations in large insectary cages.

methodsLife history characteristics of Anopheles gambiae wild type and Ag(PMB)1 (aka

resultsThe frequency of transgenic mosquitoes in target populations reached an average of 0.44 ± 0.02 and 0.56 ± 0.02 after 6 weeks in the 1:1 and in the 3:1 release ratio treatments (transgenic male:wild male) respectively. Transgenic males caused sex-ratio distortion of 73% and 80% males in the 1:1 and 3:1 treatments, respectively. The number of eggs laid in the transgenic treatments declined as the experiment progressed, with a steeper decline in the 3:1 than in the 1:1 releases. The results of the experiment are partially consistent with predictions of the model; effect size and variability did not conform to the model in two out of three trials, effect size was over-estimated by the model and variability was greater than anticipated, possibly because of sampling effects in restocking. The model estimating the effects of hypothetical releases on the mosquito population of a West African village demonstrated that releases could significantly reduce the number of females in the wild population. The interval of releases is not expected to have a strong effect.

conclusionsThe biological data produced to parameterize the model, the model itself, and the results of the experiments are components of a system to evaluate and predict the performance of transgenic mosquitoes. Together these suggest that the Ag(PMB)1 strain has the potential to be useful for reversible population suppression while this novel field develops.

Indexed as

Sex RatioTransgenesAfrica, WesternAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAnophelesFemaleLinear ModelsMalariaMaleMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsAnopheles gambiaeGenetic controlGenetic loadMalariaMale-biasPopulation modelValidation

Identifiers

PMID30728060
PMCPMC6366042
OpenAlexW2937681798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.