Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728040›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

The FreeD module for the Lokomat facilitates a physiological movement pattern in healthy people - a proof of concept study.

Tabea Aurich-Schuler, Anja Gut, Rob Labruyère

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04910217 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Robot-Assisted Gait Therapy in the Subacute Phase of First Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital OstravaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsConventional rehabilitation, Leg/lower body exerciser device intervention., Lokomat intervention
NCT07365384 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Pelvic-Free and Pelvic-Restricted Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Walking Pattern, Balance, and Fear of Falling After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorMeltem Gunes AkinciRan2026 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsStroke, Hemiplegia, Gait Disorder, Sensorimotor, Balance ImpairmentArmsRoboGait® Pelvic-Free Mode, RoboGait® Pelvic-Restricted Mode, Conventional Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tabea Aurich-SchulerRehabilitation Center Affoltern am Albis, Children's University Hospital Zurich, Mühlebergstrasse 104, CH-8910, Affoltern am Albis, Switzerland. tabea.aurich@kispi.uzh.ch.
Anja GutRehabilitation Center Affoltern am Albis, Children's University Hospital Zurich, Mühlebergstrasse 104, CH-8910, Affoltern am Albis, Switzerland.
Rob LabruyèreRehabilitation Center Affoltern am Albis, Children's University Hospital Zurich, Mühlebergstrasse 104, CH-8910, Affoltern am Albis, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity Children's Hospital Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA contralateral pelvic drop, a transverse rotation and a lateral translation of the pelvis are essential features of normal human gait. These motions are often restricted in robot-assisted gait devices. The optional FreeD module of the driven gait orthosis Lokomat (Hocoma AG, Switzerland) incorporates guided lateral translation and transverse rotation of the pelvis. It consequently should support weight shifting during walking. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the FreeD module on trunk kinematics and hip and trunk muscle activity.

methodsThirty- one healthy adults participated. A video analysis of their trunk movements was performed to investigate the lateral chest and pelvis displacement within the Lokomat (with and without FreeD), and this was compared to treadmill walking. Furthermore, surface electromyography (sEMG) signals from eight muscles were collected during walking in the Lokomat (with and without FreeD), on the treadmill, and overground. To compare the similarity of the sEMG patterns, Spearman's correlation analyses were applied.

resultsWalking with FreeD elicited a significantly higher lateral pelvis displacement and a lower lateral chest displacement (relative to the pelvis) compared to walking with a fixated pelvis. No significant differences in the sEMG patterns were found for the Lokomat conditions (with and without FreeD) when comparing it to treadmill or overground walking.

conclusionsThe differences in pelvis displacement act as a proof of concept of the FreeD module. The reduction of relative lateral chest movement corresponds to a decrease in compensatory trunk movements and has its origin in allowing weight shifting through the FreeD module. Both Lokomat conditions showed very similar muscle activity patterns of the trunk and hip compared to overground and treadmill walking. This indicates that the Lokomat allows a physiological muscle activity of the trunk and hip during gait.

Indexed as

MovementOrthotic DevicesAdolescentAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyFemaleHealthy VolunteersHipHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalPelvisProof of Concept StudyRoboticsChestLateral translationPath controlPelvisRehabilitationRobot-assisted gait therapySurface electromyographyTransverse rotationTrunk movementsWeight shifting

Identifiers

PMID30728040
PMCPMC6366098
OpenAlexW2920724222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.