Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728009›Full record

SynthesisRespiratory research2019

Porcine vs bovine surfactant therapy for preterm neonates with RDS: systematic review with biological plausibility and pragmatic meta-analysis of respiratory outcomes.

Ascanio Tridente, Lucia De Martino, Daniele De Luca

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Respiratory research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Association between Removal of High-Frequency Oscillations and the Effect of Epilepsy Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Comparison of efficacy between beractant and poractant alfa in respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants (28-33Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Transient tachypnoea: new concepts on the commonest neonatal respiratory disorder.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  11. Comparative biophysical study of clinical surfactants using constrained drop surfactometry.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative efficacy and safety of late surfactant preparations: a retrospective study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ascanio TridenteDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Lucia De MartinoDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, Medical Center "A. Béclère", South Paris University Hospitals, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) , Paris, France.
Daniele De LucaDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, Medical Center "A. Béclère", South Paris University Hospitals, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) , Paris, France. daniele.deluca@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3846-4834
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBovine surfactants are known to be clinically equivalent but it is unclear if porcine or bovine surfactants at their licensed dose should be preferred to treat respiratory distress syndrome in preterm neonates.

methodsWe performed a comprehensive review of biochemical and pharmacological features of surfactants to understand the biological plausibility of any clinical effect. We then performed a pragmatic meta-analysis comparing internationally marketed porcine and bovine surfactants for mortality and respiratory outcomes. Search for randomised controlled trials with no language/year restrictions and excluding "grey" literature, unpublished or non-peer reviewed reports was conducted, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the most recent methodological recommendations.

resultsSixteen articles were included in the review and 14 in the meta-analysis (1491 neonates). 200 mg/kg poractant-α (a porcine surfactant) was associated with lower BPD/mortality (OR 0.632[95%CI:0.494, 0.809];p < 0.001),BPD (OR 0.688[95%CI:0.512, 0.925];p = 0.013), retreatment (OR 0.313[95%CI:0.187, 0.522];p < 0.0001), airleaks (OR 0.505[95%CI:0.308, 0.827];p = 0.006) and lung haemorrhage (OR 0.624[95%CI:0.388, 1];p = 0.051). Gestational age is associated with effect size for BPD (coefficient: 0.308 [95%CI:0.063, 0.554];p = 0.014) and surfactant retreatment (coefficient: -0.311 [95%CI:-0.595, - 0.028];p = 0.031).

conclusion200 mg/kg poractant-α is associated with better respiratory outcomes compared to bovine surfactants at their licensed dose. The effect of poractant-α on BPD and surfactant retreatment is greater at lowest and highest gestational ages, respectively.

trial registrationPROSPERO n.42017075251 .

Indexed as

CattleInfant, PrematureSwineAnimalsHumansInfant, NewbornPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPulmonary SurfactantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornPulmonary SurfactantsNeonateRDSSurfactantTherapy

Identifiers

PMID30728009
PMCPMC6366095
OpenAlexW2920999626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.