Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30728008›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Experiences and responses of second victims of patient safety incidents in Korea: a qualitative study.

Won Lee, Jeehee Pyo, Seung Gyeong Jang, Ji Eun Choi, Minsu Ock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Necessity and Characteristics.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Won LeeAsian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeehee PyoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877, Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44055, Republic of Korea.
Seung Gyeong JangAsian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Eun ChoiOffice of Research Planning and Coordination Department, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minsu OckDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877, Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44055, Republic of Korea. ohohoms@naver.com.
Yonsei University · KRNational Evidenc- based healthcare Collaborating Agency · KRUlsan College · KRUlsan University Hospital · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2018R1C1B6005186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare professionals who experience trauma due to patient safety incidents can be considered second victims, and they also suffer from various difficulties. In order to support second victims, it is necessary to determine the circumstances of the incidents in question, along with the symptoms that the victims are experiencing and the support they require. A qualitative study on healthcare professionals of various occupations, such as physicians and nurses working in Korea, was conducted, and the experiences and response methods and processes of second victims were examined.

methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 16 healthcare professionals (six physicians, eight nurses, and two pharmacists) who had experienced a patient safety incident. All interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the data analysis was conducted in accordance with Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory. Both open coding and axial coding were performed. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were applied in this study.

resultsThe results of the open coding demonstrated that the experiences of second victims can be categorized into "the reactions of the first victim and surrounding people after the incident," "Influence of factors aside from the incident," "the initial complex responses of the participants to the incident," "open discussion of the incident," "the culture in medical institutions regarding early-stage incident response," "the coping responses of the participants after incidents," and "living with the incident." Then, the seven categories in the open coding stage were rearranged according to the paradigm model, and the reaction process of the second victims was analyzed through process analysis, being divided into the "entanglement stage," "agitating stage," "struggling stage," "managing stage," and "indurating stage."

conclusionsThis research is significant because it provides a comprehensive understanding of second victims' experiences in the eastern region of Korea, by obtaining data using a qualitative research method. The findings of the study also highlight the five stages of the second victim response process, and can be used to design a specialized second victim support program in Korea.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleGrounded TheoryHealth PersonnelHumansMaleNursesOccupational StressPharmacistsPhysiciansPsychological TraumaQualitative ResearchRepublic of KoreaSocial SupportEmotional distressGrounded theoryMedical litigationPatient safetyQualitative researchRepublic of KoreaSecond victims

Identifiers

PMID30728008
PMCPMC6366082
OpenAlexW2922301713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.