ArticleBMC structural biology2019
A new technique for predicting intrinsically disordered regions based on average distance map constructed with inter-residue average distance statistics.
Article in BMC structural biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Importance of Inter-residue Contacts for Understanding Protein Folding and Unfolding Rates, Remote Homology, and Drug Design.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Review
- Inter-Residue Distance Prediction From Duet Deep Learning Models.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Aggregation-Prone Structural Ensembles of Transthyretin Collected With Regression Analysis for NMR Chemical Shift.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Analyses of the folding sites of irregular β-trefoil fold proteins through sequence-based techniques and Gō-model simulations.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2020Article
- Common Functions of Disordered Proteins across Evolutionary Distant Organisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt had long been thought that a protein exhibits its specific function through its own specific 3D-structure under physiological conditions. However, subsequent research has shown that there are many proteins without specific 3D-structures under physiological conditions, so-called intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). This study presents a new technique for predicting intrinsically disordered regions in a protein, based on our average distance map (ADM) technique. The ADM technique was developed to predict compact regions or structural domains in a protein. In a protein containing partially disordered regions, a domain region is likely to be ordered, thus it is unlikely that a disordered region would be part of any domain. Therefore, the ADM technique is expected to also predict a disordered region between domains.
resultsThe results of our new technique are comparable to the top three performing techniques in the community-wide CASP10 experiment. We further discuss the case of p53, a tumor-suppressor protein, which is the most significant protein among cell cycle regulatory proteins. This protein exhibits a disordered character as a monomer but an ordered character when two p53s form a dimer.
conclusionOur technique can predict the location of an intrinsically disordered region in a protein with an accuracy comparable to the best techniques proposed so far. Furthermore, it can also predict a core region of IDPs forming definite 3D structures through interactions, such as dimerization. The technique in our study may also serve as a means of predicting a disordered region which would become an ordered structure when binding to another protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.