SynthesisBMC public health2019
Health and social impacts of open defecation on women: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence on the links between water insecurity, inadequate sanitation and mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Community-based interventions addressing open defecation in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.Global health action · 2026Article
- Formative research for a One Health, animal-inclusive approach to Community-Led Total Sanitation in rural Mali.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- What Makes Household Sanitation Systems Resilient to Floods? Evidence from Ethiopia, Uganda, and Nepal.ACS ES&T water · 2026Article
- Exploring the burden of diarrheal disease and associated WASH practices in rural West Bengal, India: an explanatory sequential mixed-method approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Behavioral patterns in latrine use and handwashing in rural western Kenya: Age, time of day, and the role of perceived safety.PloS one · 2026Article
- Household resilience and adaptation strategies for enhancing access to energy, water, and food during droughts and floods: A qualitative study.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2026Article
- Designing equity-focused sanitation policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: the critical role of subnational data.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Examining the association between toilet access and major depression among older adults in India: a cross-sectional analysis of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India from 2017 to 2018.Age and ageing · 2025Article
- Contextual and psychosocial factors predicting sanitation behaviours in rural Indonesia.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis prevalence and associated factors among school children in the Hawela Tula sub-city, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2025Article
- The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on Open Defecation and Fecal Oral diseases in Soin ward, Kericho County, Kenya.Environmental health insights · 2025Article
- Rewarding behavior change in rural communities: Pathways for a sustained inclusive change for child health.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Open defecation among Kenyan households: an analysis of demographic and health survey 2022 and census report of 2019.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Exposure behaviour to Escherichia coli among households in Imvepi refugee settlement, Terego district Uganda.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Mapping and predicting open defecation in Ethiopia: 2021 PMA-ET study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Determinants of low birth weight and its effect on childhood health and nutritional outcomes in Bangladesh.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Open defecation practice among households with latrines in rural communities of Ararso District, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe significance of sanitation to safeguard human health is irrefutable and has important public health dimensions. Access to sanitation has been essential for human dignity, health and well-being. Despite 15 years of conjunctive efforts under the global action plans like Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), 2.3 billion people have no access to improved sanitation facilities (flush latrine or pit latrine) and nearly 892 million of the total world's population is still practicing open defecation.
methodsThe study provides a systematic review of the published literature related to implications of open defecation that goes beyond the scope of addressing health outcomes by also investigating social outcomes associated with open defecation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used to frame the review, empirical studies focusing upon open defecation in women aged 13-50 in low and middle income countries were included in the review. Research papers included in the review were assessed for quality using appropriate critical appraisal tools. In total 9 articles were included in the review; 5 of these related to health effects and 4 related to social effects of open defecation.
resultsThe review identified 4 overarching themes; Health Impacts of open defecation, Increased risk of sexual exploitation, Threat to women's privacy and dignity and Psychosocial stressors linked to open defecation, which clearly present a serious situation of poor sanitation in rural communities of Lower-Middle Income Countries (LMICs). The findings of the review identified that open defecation promotes poor health in women with long-term negative effects on their psychosocial well-being, however it is a poorly researched topic.
conclusionThe health and social needs of women and girls remain largely unmet and often side-lined in circumstances where toilets in homes are not available. Further research is critically required to comprehend the generalizability of effects of open defecation on girls and women. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42019119946 . Registered 9 January 2019 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.