Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30727944›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2019

Phylogenetic relationship of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolated from poultry and diverse avian hosts based on 16S rRNA and rpoB gene analyses.

Inês M B Veiga, Dörte Lüschow, Stefanie Gutzer, Hafez M Hafez, Kristin Mühldorfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The first isolation and detection ofVeterinary world · 2021
    Article
  5. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Veterinary sciences · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inês M B VeigaPresent Address: Institute of Animal Pathology, Bern, Switzerland.
Dörte LüschowInstitute of Poultry Diseases, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie GutzerInstitute of Poultry Diseases, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hafez M HafezInstitute of Poultry Diseases, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kristin MühldorferDepartment of Wildlife Diseases, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany. muehldorfer@izw-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8023-4736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrnithobacterium (O.) rhinotracheale is an emerging bacterial pathogen in poultry and not fully understood to date. Because of its importance particularly for the global turkey meat industry, reliable diagnostic and characterization methods are needed for early treatment and in future for better vaccine production. The host range of birds infected by O. rhinotracheale or carrying the bacterium in their respiratory tract has constantly increased raising important epidemiological and taxonomic questions for a better understanding of its diversity, ecology and transmission cycles. The purpose of this study was to introduce partial rpoB gene sequencing for O. rhinotracheale into routine diagnostics to differentiate strains isolated from poultry and more diverse avian hosts (i.e., birds of prey, corvids and pigeons) and to compare phylogenetic relationships with results from 16S rRNA gene analysis and multilocus sequence typing (MLST).

resultsPartial 16S rRNA gene analysis revealed a high level of homogeneity among the 65 investigated O. rhinotracheale sequences with similarity values ranging from 98.6 to 100% between sequences from non-galliform and poultry species. The corresponding rpoB gene sequences were heterogeneous and ranged in their similarity values from 85.1 to 100%. The structure of the rpoB tree was in strong correlation with previous MLST results revealing three main clusters A (poultry and birds of prey), B (poultry, birds of prey and corvids) and C (pigeons), which were clearly separated from each other.

conclusionsBy using partial sequences from a single gene, the rpoB gene analysis is in good agreement with MLST results with a slight decrease in resolution to distinguish more similar strains. The present results provide strong evidence that traditional phenotypic and genetic methods may not properly represent the heterogeneous group of bacteria classified as O. rhinotracheale. From housekeeping gene analyses, it is very likely that the genus Ornithobacterium includes additional species and partial rpoB gene sequencing can be recommended as fast, cost-effective and readily available method to identify strains and differentiate between O. rhinotracheale and Ornithobacterium-like bacteria.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesBirdsFlavobacteriaceae InfectionsGenes, BacterialMultilocus Sequence TypingOrnithobacteriumPoultryPoultry DiseasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNATurkeysRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacteriaBirdsDiagnosticsFlavobacteriaceaeOrnithobacteriumORTPCRPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID30727944
PMCPMC6364391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.