Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30727942›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Shambhala: a platform-agnostic data harmonizer for gene expression data.

Nicolas Borisov, Irina Shabalina, Victor Tkachev, Maxim Sorokin, Andrew Garazha, Andrey Pulin, Ilya I Eremin, Anton Buzdin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicolas BorisovI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Sechenov University, Moscow, 119991, Russia. borisov@oncobox.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-5524
Irina ShabalinaFaculty of Mathematics and Information Technologies, Petrozavodsk State University, Anokhina str., 20, Petrozavodsk, 185910, Russia.
Victor TkachevDepartment of bioinformatics and molecular networks, OmicsWay Corporation, Walnut, CA, USA.
Maxim SorokinI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Sechenov University, Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Andrew GarazhaDepartment of bioinformatics and molecular networks, OmicsWay Corporation, Walnut, CA, USA.
Andrey PulinLaboratory for Cell Biology and Developmental Pathology, Federal State Institution "Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology", FSBSI "IGPP", Moscow, Russia.
Ilya I EreminDepartment for Regenerative Medicine, JSC Generium, Moscow, Russia.
Anton BuzdinI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Sechenov University, Moscow, 119991, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation Russian Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHarmonization techniques make different gene expression profiles and their sets compatible and ready for comparisons. Here we present a new bioinformatic tool termed Shambhala for harmonization of multiple human gene expression datasets obtained using different experimental methods and platforms of microarray hybridization and RNA sequencing.

resultsUnlike previously published methods enabling good quality data harmonization for only two datasets, Shambhala allows conversion of multiple datasets into the universal form suitable for further comparisons. Shambhala harmonization is based on the calibration of gene expression profiles using the auxiliary standardization dataset. Each profile is transformed to make it similar to the output of microarray hybridization platform Affymetrix Human Gene. This platform was chosen because it has the biggest number of human gene expression profiles deposited in public databases. We evaluated Shambhala ability to retain biologically important features after harmonization. The same four biological samples taken in multiple replicates were profiled independently using three and four different experimental platforms, respectively, then Shambhala-harmonized and investigated by hierarchical clustering.

conclusionOur results showed that unlike other frequently used methods: quantile normalization and DESeq/DESeq2 normalization, Shambhala harmonization was the only method supporting sample-specific and platform-independent biologically meaningful clustering for the data obtained from multiple experimental platforms.

Indexed as

SoftwareCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansReproducibility of ResultsComparison of multiple datasetsGene expressionHarmonization of transcriptional profilesMicroarray hybridizationNext-generation sequencingTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30727942
PMCPMC6366102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.