ArticleJournal of animal science2019
Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Marker effect p-values for single-step GWAS with the algorithm for proven and young in large genotyped populations.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- MAGE: metafounders-assisted genomic estimation of breeding value, a novel additive-dominance single-step model in crossbreeding systems.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Genetic parameters for pelvic organ prolapse in purebred and crossbred sows.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Multi-line ssGBLUP evaluation using preselected markers from whole-genome sequence data in pigs.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Optimisation of the core subset for the APY approximation of genomic relationships.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Genotyping and phenotyping strategies for genetic improvement of meat quality and carcass composition in swine.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- An Appropriate Genetic Approach for Improving Reproductive Traits in Crossbred Thai-Holstein Cattle under Heat Stress Conditions.Veterinary sciences · 2022Review
- Review: optimizing genomic selection for crossbred performance by model improvement and data collection.Journal of animal science · 2021Review
- Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.Journal of animal science · 2021Article
- Can Cross-Country Genomic Predictions Be a Reasonable Strategy to Support Germplasm Exchange? - A Case Study With Hydrogen Cyanide in Cassava.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Core-dependent changes in genomic predictions using the Algorithm for Proven and Young in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
- Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.Genes · 2020Review
- Current status of genomic evaluation.Journal of animal science · 2020Review
- Comparing Alternative Single-Step GBLUP Approaches and Training Population Designs for Genomic Evaluation of Crossbred Animals.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is routinely applied to many purebreds and lines of farm species. However, this method can be extended to predictions across purebreds as well as for crossbreds. This is useful for swine and poultry, for which selection in nucleus herds is typically performed on purebred animals, whereas the commercial product is the crossbred animal. Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) is a widely applied method that can explore the recently developed algorithm for proven and young (APY). The APY allows for greater efficiency in computing BLUP solutions by exploiting the theory of limited dimensionality of genomic information and chromosome segments (Me). This study investigates the predictivity as a proxy for accuracy across and within 2 purebred pig lines and their crosses, under the application of APY in ssGBLUP setup, and different levels of Me overlapping across populations. The data consisted of approximately 210k phenotypic records for 2 traits (T1 and T2) with moderate heritability. Genotypes for 43k SNP markers were available for approximately 46k animals, from which 26k and 16k belong to 2 pure lines (L1 and L2), and approximately 4k are crossbreds. The complete pedigree had more than 720k animals. Different multivariate ssGBLUP models were applied, either with the regular or APY inverse of the genomic relationship matrix (G). The models included a standard bivariate animal model with 3 lines evaluated as 1 joint line, and for each trait individually, a 3-trait animal model with each line treated as a separate trait. Both models provided the same predictivity across and within the lines. Using either of the pure lines data as a training set resulted in a similar predictivity for the crossbreed animals (0.18 to 0.21). Across-line predictive ability was limited to less than half of the maximum predictivity for each line (L1T1 0.33, L1T2 0.25, L2T1 0.35, L2T2 0.36). For crossbred predictions, APY performed equivalently to regular G inverse when the number of core animals was equal to the number of eigenvalues explaining between 98% and 99% of the variance of G (4k to 8k) including all lines. Predictivity across the lines is achievable because of the shared Me between them. The number of those shared segments can be obtained via eigenvalue decomposition of genomic information available for each line.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.