Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30726910›Full record

SynthesisThe Gerontologist2020

Provider and LGBT Individuals' Perspectives on LGBT Issues in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review.

Billy A Caceres, Jasmine Travers, Jillian E Primiano, Rachel E Luscombe, Caroline Dorsen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Gerontologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Recruiting Sexual and Gender Minority Older Adults With and Without Dementia in Long-Term Care: Overcoming Barriers and Lessons Learned.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The CIRCLE Care Home Guide: A Co-Designed Resource on LGBTQ+ Inclusion for Care Homes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. "I Want to Grow Older With Dignity": Older LGBTQ+ Canadian Adults' Perceptions and Experiences of Aging.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Sexual and gender minority health-related content in geriatric fellowships.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Billy A CaceresProgram for the Study of LGBT Health, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York.
Jasmine TraversNational Clinician Scholars Program, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jillian E PrimianoWyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
Rachel E LuscombeVisiting Nurse Service of New York, New York.
Caroline DorsenNew York University Rory Meyers, College of Nursing, New York.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Systems Science and Comparative and Cost-Effectiveness Research Training for Nurse Scientists (S2CER2)T32NR014205 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Lusine Poghosyan, Jingjing Shang · 2013 to 2026
$4.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NINR NIH HHS T32 NR014205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesDiscrimination toward the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) population has raised concerns about the type of long-term services and supports (LTSS) that will be available to them as they age. To understand the unique needs of aging LGBT populations, we sought to synthesize and critique the evidence related to LTSS providers and LGBT individuals' perspectives of LGBT issues in LTSS in the United States. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, a systematic review of the literature was conducted. The Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool was used to appraise the quality of the included studies.

resultsNineteen studies met inclusion criteria. Seven studies that examined the perspectives of LTSS providers identified two themes, including that they lack knowledge and training on LGBT health issues and generally report negative attitudes toward same-sex relations among older adults. In addition, 12 studies that examined the perspectives of LGBT individuals found that they (i) are concerned about LTSS planning, (ii) fear discrimination from providers in LTSS, and (iii) identify several strategies for improving care of LGBT older adults receiving LTSS. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This systematic review highlights the importance for LTSS providers to receive training in LGBT health and be reflective of potential biases toward the LGBT population. LGBT individuals identified concerns related to LTSS planning and fear of discrimination from LTSS providers. LGBT individuals also identified a need for increased training of providers to improve the care of LGBT older adults in LTSS.

Indexed as

Residential FacilitiesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedSexual and Gender MinoritiesYoung AdultDiscriminationLGBT healthLiterature synthesisLong-term services and supports

Identifiers

PMID30726910
PMCPMC7117618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.