Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30726870›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

How well do RNA-Seq differential gene expression tools perform in a complex eukaryote? A case study in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Kimon Froussios, Nick J Schurch, Katarzyna Mackinnon, Marek Gierliński, Céline Duc, Gordon G Simpson, Geoffrey J Barton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Regulatory Small RNAs for a Sustained Eco-Agriculture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Transcriptome-Wide Gene Expression Plasticity inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kimon FroussiosDivision of Computational Biology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Nick J SchurchDivision of Computational Biology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Katarzyna MackinnonCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Marek GierlińskiDivision of Computational Biology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Céline DucCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Gordon G SimpsonCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Geoffrey J BartonDivision of Computational Biology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H002286/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J00247X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M004155/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M010066/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationRNA-seq experiments are usually carried out in three or fewer replicates. In order to work well with so few samples, differential gene expression (DGE) tools typically assume the form of the underlying gene expression distribution. In this paper, the statistical properties of gene expression from RNA-seq are investigated in the complex eukaryote, Arabidopsis thaliana, extending and generalizing the results of previous work in the simple eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

resultsWe show that, consistent with the results in S.cerevisiae, more gene expression measurements in A.thaliana are consistent with being drawn from an underlying negative binomial distribution than either a log-normal distribution or a normal distribution, and that the size and complexity of the A.thaliana transcriptome does not influence the false positive rate performance of nine widely used DGE tools tested here. We therefore recommend the use of DGE tools that are based on the negative binomial distribution. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The raw data for the 17 WT Arabidopsis thaliana datasets is available from the European Nucleotide Archive (E-MTAB-5446). The processed and aligned data can be visualized in context using IGB (Freese et al., 2016), or downloaded directly, using our publicly available IGB quickload server at https://compbio.lifesci.dundee.ac.uk/arabidopsisQuickload/public_quickload/ under 'RNAseq>Froussios2019'. All scripts and commands are available from github at https://github.com/bartongroup/KF_arabidopsis-GRNA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBinomial DistributionRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID30726870
PMCPMC6748783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.