Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30726466›Full record

ReviewAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Adult female acne: a guide to clinical practice.

Edileia Bagatin, Thais Helena Proença de Freitas, Maria Cecília Rivitti-Machado, Maria Cecilia Rivitti Machado, Beatriz Medeiros Ribeiro, Samanta Nunes, Marco Alexandre Dias da Rocha

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy and safety of oral doxycycline for acne vulgaris treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Erratum.Machado MCR [corrected to Rivitti-Machado MC]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edileia BagatinDepartment of Dermatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7190-8241
Thais Helena Proença de FreitasDermatology Service, Hospital da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5594-3837
Maria Cecília Rivitti-Machado
Maria Cecilia Rivitti Machado *Department of Dermatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-7330
Beatriz Medeiros RibeiroDermatology Service, Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Secretaria de Saúde do Distrito Federal, Brasília (DF), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2171-9378
Samanta NunesCorium Dermatologia, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5846-3372
Marco Alexandre Dias da RochaService of Cosmiatry, Department of Dermatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1090-177X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcne in women is often associated with anxiety and depression, and may persist from adolescence as well as manifest for the first time in adulthood. Genetic and hormonal factors contribute to its etiopathogenesis, and maintenance treatment is required, usually for years, due to its clinical evolution.

objectiveTo develop a guide for the clinical practice of adult female acne.

methodsA team of five experts with extensive experience in acne conducted a literature review of the main scientific evidence and met to discuss the best practices and personal experiences to develop a guide containing recommendations for the clinical practice of adult female acne.

resultsThe group of specialists reached consensus on the main guidelines for clinical practice, providing detailed recommendations on clinical picture, etiopathogenesis, laboratory investigation and treatment of adult female acne.

conclusionDifferent from teenage acne, adult female acne presents some characteristics and multiple etiopathogenic factors that make its management more complex. This guide provides recommendations for best clinical practices and therapeutic decisions. However, the authors consider that additional studies are needed in order to provide more evidence for adult female acne to be better understood.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisAdultAndrogensAnti-Bacterial AgentsConsensusDermatologic AgentsFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of LifeRisk FactorsSebumAndrogensAnti-Bacterial AgentsDermatologic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30726466
PMCPMC6360964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.