Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30726180›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2019

Causal Evidence for the Role of Neuronal Oscillations in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention.

Justin Riddle, Kai Hwang, Dillan Cellier, Sofia Dhanani, Mark D'Esposito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prioritizing Working Memory Resources Depends on the Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prioritizing working memory resources depends on prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justin RiddleUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Kai HwangUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Dillan CellierUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Sofia DhananiUniversity of California, Berkeley.
Mark D'EspositoUniversity of California, Berkeley.

Funding

Working Memory and Prefrontal CortexR01MH063901 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Neural dynamics of human working memory networksR01MH111737 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
Investigating brain network dynamics with simultaneous TMS-fMRIR03MH103842 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2014 to 2015
$157k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063901NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111737NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH103842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beta and gamma frequency neuronal oscillations have been implicated in top-down and bottom-up attention. In this study, we used rhythmic TMS to modulate ongoing beta and gamma frequency neuronal oscillations in frontal and parietal cortex while human participants performed a visual search task that manipulates bottom-up and top-down attention (single feature and conjunction search). Both task conditions will engage bottom-up attention processes, although the conjunction search condition will require more top-down attention. Gamma frequency TMS to superior precentral sulcus (sPCS) slowed saccadic RTs during both task conditions and induced a response bias to the contralateral visual field. In contrary, beta frequency TMS to sPCS and intraparietal sulcus decreased search accuracy only during the conjunction search condition that engaged more top-down attention. Furthermore, beta frequency TMS increased trial errors specifically when the target was in the ipsilateral visual field for the conjunction search condition. These results indicate that beta frequency TMS to sPCS and intraparietal sulcus disrupted top-down attention, whereas gamma frequency TMS to sPCS disrupted bottom-up, stimulus-driven attention processes. These findings provide causal evidence suggesting that beta and gamma oscillations have distinct functional roles for cognition.

Indexed as

Beta RhythmGamma RhythmAdolescentAdultAttentionBrain MappingFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobeReaction TimeSaccadesSpatial ProcessingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30726180
PMCPMC6701188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.