Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30725536›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2019

Leveraging marginal structural modeling with Cox regression to assess the survival benefit of accepting vs declining kidney allograft offers.

Jordana B Cohen, Vishnu Potluri, Paige M Porrett, Ruohui Chen, Marielle Roselli, Justine Shults, Deirdre L Sawinski, Peter P Reese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jordana B CohenRenal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-4649-079X
Vishnu PotluriRenal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Paige M PorrettDivision of Transplant Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ruohui ChenCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Marielle RoselliCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Justine ShultsCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Deirdre L SawinskiRenal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Peter P ReeseRenal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Management of hypertension in obesity: Antihypertensive class effects, blood pressure control, and renal and cardiac outcomesK23HL133843 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COHEN, JORDANA B. · 2016 to 2020
$945k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing studies evaluating the survival benefit of kidney transplantation were unable to incorporate time-updated information on decisions related to each organ offer. We used national registry data, including organ turndown data, to evaluate the survival benefit of accepting vs turning down kidney offers in candidates waitlisted from 2007-2013. Among candidates who declined their first offer, only 43% ultimately received organ transplantations. Recipients who later underwent organ transplantation after declining their first offer had markedly longer wait times than recipients who accepted their first offer, and 56% received kidney transplants that were of similar or lower quality compared to their initial offer. In marginal structural modeling analyses accounting for time-updated offer characteristics (including Kidney Donor Profile Index, Public Health System risk status, and pumping), after 3 months posttransplant, there was a significant survival benefit of accepting an offer (adjusted hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.89) that was similar among diabetics, candidates aged >65 years, and candidates living in donor service areas with the longest waitlist times. After carefully accounting for the effect of donor quality, we confirm that the survival benefit of accepting an organ offer is clinically meaningful and persistent beyond 3 months post-kidney transplantation, including high-risk subgroups of organ transplantation candidates.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk AssessmentTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsTransplantation, HomologousTransplant RecipientsTreatment Outcomeclinical research/practicedonors and donation: deceasedepidemiologykidney (allograft) function/dysfunctionkidney transplantation/nephrologyorgan acceptanceorgan procurement and allocationpatient survival

Identifiers

PMID30725536
PMCPMC6591028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.