Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30725369›Full record

ArticleOecologia2019

Low food availability during gestation enhances offspring post-natal growth, but reduces survival, in a viviparous lizard.

Thomas Botterill-James, Kirke L Munch, Ben Halliwell, David G Chapple, Michael G Gardner, Erik Wapstra, Geoffrey M While

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas Botterill-JamesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS, 7005, Australia.
Kirke L MunchSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS, 7005, Australia.
Ben HalliwellSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS, 7005, Australia.
David G ChappleSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Michael G GardnerCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Erik WapstraSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS, 7005, Australia.
Geoffrey M WhileSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS, 7005, Australia. Geoffrey.While@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8122-9322

Funding

Australian Research Council DP150102900Australian Research Council (AU) DE150100336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environment experienced by a mother can have profound effects on the fitness of her offspring (i.e., maternal effects). Maternal effects can be adaptive when the developmental environments experienced by offspring promote phenotypes that provide fitness benefits either via matching offspring phenotype to the post-developmental environment (also known as anticipatory maternal effects) or through direct effects on offspring growth and survival. We tested these hypotheses in a viviparous lizard using a factorial experimental design in which mothers received either high or low amounts of food during gestation, and resultant offspring were raised on either high or low amounts of food post-birth. We found no effect of food availability during gestation on reproductive traits of mothers or offspring traits at birth. However, offspring from mothers who received low food during gestation exhibited a greater increase in condition in the post-birth period, suggesting some form of priming of offspring by mothers to cope with an anticipated poor environment after birth. Offspring that received low food during gestation were also more likely to die, suggesting a trade-off for this accelerated growth. There were also significant effects of post-birth food availability on offspring snout-vent length and body condition growth, with offspring with high food availability post birth doing better. However, the effects of the pre- and post-natal resource evnironment on offspring growth were independent on one another, therefore, providing no support for the presence of anticipatory maternal effects in the traditional sense.

Indexed as

LizardsAnimalsFemaleFoodMothersPhenotypeReproductionDevelopmental plasticityEgerniaLiopholisLizardMaternal effect

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.