ArticleDrug safety2019
A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding.
Article in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Identify Patterns and Predictors of Adverse Drug Reactions in Cardiovascular Patients: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Review
- Adverse Drug Reactions in Neonates: How to Detect and Address Signals in the Noise.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025Article
- The use of international classification of diseases codes to identify hospital admissions linked with adverse drug events: Validation study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: a narrative review and practical experience with an expert-defined Bayesian network tool.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Review
- Serious Adverse Events: A Replicability and Validation Study of Naranjo Causality Assessment Tool in a Canadian Clinical Setting.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- LEVERAGING UNSTRUCTURED DATA IN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS TO DETECT ADVERSE EVENTS FROM PEDIATRIC DRUG USE - A SCOPING REVIEW.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- The impact of transition to a digital hospital on medication errors (TIME study).NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Linking Activity Theory Within User-Centered Design: Novel Framework to Inform Design and Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems in Pharmacy.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Support Detection of Neonatal Adverse Drug Reactions Based on Severity and Probability Scores: A New Risk Score as Web-Tool.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Intelligent Telehealth in Pharmacovigilance: A Future Perspective.Drug safety · 2022Review
- Machine Learning in Causal Inference: Application in Pharmacovigilance.Drug safety · 2022Review
- Evaluation of two European risk models for predicting medication harm in an Australian patient cohort.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Machine learning risk prediction model for acute coronary syndrome and death from use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in administrative data.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Development and Implementation of an e-Trigger Tool for Adverse Drug Events in a Swiss University Hospital.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2021Article
- Precision Dosing of Doxapram in Preterm Infants Using Continuous Pharmacodynamic Data and Model-Based Pharmacokinetics: An Illustrative Case Series.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Identifying medication harm in hospitalised patients: a bimodal, targeted approach.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdverse drug reaction (ADR) detection in hospitals is heavily reliant on spontaneous reporting by clinical staff, with studies in the literature pointing to high rates of underreporting [1]. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes have been used in epidemiological studies of ADRs and offer the potential for automated ADR detection systems.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop an automated ADR detection system based on ICD-10 codes, using machine-learning algorithms to improve accuracy and efficiency.
methodsFor a 12-month period from December 2016 to November 2017, every inpatient episode receiving an ICD-10 code in the range Y40.0-Y59.9 (ADR code) was flagged for review as a potential ADR. Each flagged admission was assessed by an expert pharmacist and, if needed, reviewed at regular ADR committee meetings. For each report, a determination was made about ADR probability and severity. The dataset was randomly split into training and test sets. A machine-learning model using the random forest algorithm was developed on the training set to discriminate between true and false ADR reports. The model was then applied to the test set to assess accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC).
resultsIn the study period, 2917 Y40.0-Y59.9 codes were applied to admissions, resulting in 245 ADR reports after review. These 245 reports accounted for 44.5% of all ADR reporting in our hospital in the study period. A random forest model built on the training set was able to discriminate between true and false reports on the test set with an AUC of 0.803.
conclusionsAutomated ADR detection using ICD-10 coding significantly improved ADR detection in the study period, with improved discrimination between true and false reports by applying a machine-learning model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30725336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.