Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30725235›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2019

The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Jie Cui, Xuxia Wei, Haijin Lv, Yuntao Li, Ping Li, Zhen Chen, Genglong Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. [Pharmacological immunomodulation in sepsis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Plasma proteomics identifies molecular subtypes in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jie CuiHead and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510095, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xuxia WeiSurgical Intensive Care Unit, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Haijin LvSurgical Intensive Care Unit, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yuntao LiNursing Department, Shaodong County People's Hospital, Shaodong, 422800, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.
Ping LiDepartment of Anesthesia, GuangDong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhen ChenIntensive Care Unit, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, 528300, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. jeanyz@foxmail.com.
Genglong LiuDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510095, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. lglong3@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-4396
Guangzhou Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNShanxi Medical University · CNThe First People's Hospital of Shunde · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is characterized by a complex immune response. This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical effectiveness of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (IVIgGM) in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

methodsFour databases, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and Embase, were systematically searched from inception to June 2018 to update the 2013 edition of the Cochrane review by two investigators, who independently selected studies, extracted relevant data, and evaluated study quality. Data were subjected to a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) for the primary and secondary outcomes. Level of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) scale.

resultsNineteen studies comprising 1530 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that the use of IVIgGM reduced the mortality risk of septic patients (relative risk 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.69, I

conclusionAdministration of IVIgGM to adult septic patients may be associated with reduced mortality. Treatment effects tended to be smaller or less consistent when including only those studies deemed adequate for each indicator. The available evidence is not clearly sufficient to support the widespread use of IVIgGM in the treatment of sepsis. Trial registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018084120. Registered on 11 February 2018.

Indexed as

IgM-enriched immunoglobulinMortalitySepsisTrial sequential analysis

Identifiers

PMID30725235
PMCPMC6365591
OpenAlexW2917384272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.