Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30725125›Full record

SynthesisHNO2019

[Diagnostics and treatment of olfactory dysfunction].

M Damm, L Schmitl, C A Müller, A Welge-Lüssen, T Hummel

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The efficacy of olfactory training in improving olfactory function: a meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Acupuncture is associated with a positive effect on odour discrimination in patients with postinfectious smell loss-a controlled prospective study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Impact of olfactory disorders on personal safety and well-being: a cross-sectional observational study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Olfactory Loss in Rhinosinusitis: Mechanisms of Loss and Recovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [The problem of long/post-COVID in expert assessments].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  15. Olfactory Dysfunction: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Allergo Journal : interdisziplinare Zeitschrift fur Allergologie und Umweltmedizin : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Allergie- und Immunitatsforschung · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Olfactory and gustatory disorders in COVID-19.Allergo journal international · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M DammHNO-Heilkunde Köln, Aachener Str. 407, 50933, Köln, Deutschland. Prof.Damm@hno-heilkunde-koeln.de.
L SchmitlBGKK Burgenländische Gebietskrankenkasse, Eisenstadt, Österreich.
C A MüllerUniversitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
A Welge-LüssenHals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Schweiz.
T HummelKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysosmia is one of the most common disorders in otorhinolaryngology. However, epidemiological data are lacking and treatment strategies are insufficiently standardized.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of causes of olfactory disorders and the different therapeutic approaches used in ENT departments in German-speaking countries. The results were also compared to findings of the survey in 2000. Furthermore, a systematic review of treatment strategies was conducted. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 2010, a two-page survey addressing olfactory dysfunction was sent to all ENT departments in German-speaking countries. The literature review included sources such as PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and relevant guidelines.

resultsThe diagnosis of dysosmia was made less frequently in ENT departments (decrease of 52%). The three most widely used therapeutic approaches were corticosteroids (topical and systemic) and systemic antibiotics. There is evidence in the literature showing a small to medium effect of topical steroids in sinonasal smell disorders.

conclusionSince a 50% decrease in the prevalence of olfactory disturbances is unlikely, the lower patient numbers may relate to a more critical diagnosis. The use of olfactory training in clinics has increased significantly (from <6% to up to 23%). The use of topical steroids for sinonasal dysosmia is evidence based. Smell training is a safe and effective treatment strategy, especially in post-infectious and post-traumatic olfactory disorders.

Indexed as

SmellHumansOlfaction DisordersSteroidsTreatment OutcomeSteroidsAnosmiaEpidemiologyHyposmiaSinunasalSteroids

Identifiers

PMID30725125
OpenAlexW2913585178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.