ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2019
[Scaphoid pseudarthrosis : Complex reconstruction using vascularized bone grafts].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Union Treatment in the Shoulder, Arm, Wrist, and Fingers: A Multicentre Retrospective Study Comparing Conventional Treatment with the Human Allogeneic Cortical Bone Screw (Shark ScrewLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Treatment of scaphoid fractures and pseudarthroses with the human allogeneic cortical bone screw. A multicentric retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023Article
- [Fractures of the carpal bones without the scaphoid bone].Der Unfallchirurg · 2021Article
- Clinical and radiological results of the vascularized medial femoral condyle graft for scaphoid non-union.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most important goals of scaphoid reconstruction in pseudarthrosis are correction of the humpback deformity, the realignment of the proximal carpal row and the bony union of the scaphoid. Therefore, in most cases bone grafting is required. To increase the healing rate and to improve vascularization, several kinds of vascularized bone grafts have been developed. Pedicled grafts are preferably harvested from the dorsal or palmar side of the distal radius with fusion rates between 27% and 100%. Free microvascular grafts can be obtained from the iliac crest and the medial or lateral femoral condyle with fusion rates between 60% and 100%. For their application microsurgical equipment and skills are required. Up to now osteochondral grafts from the femoral condyle offer the only chance for joint surface replacement by transferring part of the surface of the femoropatellar joint. The use of vascularized grafts is still a matter of controversy, since their superiority is still unproven compared to nonvascularized grafts, which also achieved 100% fusion rates in several series. They are indicated in secondary procedures after failed reconstruction and nonunion with small avascular proximal pole fragments. Since no evidence-based guidelines exist, this article provides an experience-based treatment algorithm for scaphoid nonunion with special consideration to vascularized bone grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.