Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30724733›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation.

Niels A Kloosterman, Jan Willem de Gee, Markus Werkle-Bergner, Ulman Lindenberger, Douglas D Garrett, Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prior Expectations Bias Confidence Judgments Through Parietal Alpha-Band Modulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Alpha and Beta Corticomotor Phase Dynamics Shape Visuomotor Control on a Single-Trial Basis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Spontaneous Alpha-Band Lateralization Extends Persistence of Visual Information in Iconic Memory by Modulating Cortical Excitability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Did you see it?eLife · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niels A KloostermanMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1134-7996
Jan Willem de GeeDepartment of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5875-8282
Markus Werkle-BergnerCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6399-9996
Ulman LindenbergerMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8428-6453
Douglas D Garrett *Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0629-7672
Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort *Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9025-3436

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Emmy Noether Programme grantDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WE4296/5-1Jacobs Foundation Early Career Research FellowshipMax-Planck-Gesellschaft Open-access funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision bias is traditionally conceptualized as an internal reference against which sensory evidence is compared. Instead, we show that individuals implement decision bias by shifting the rate of sensory evidence accumulation toward a decision bound. Participants performed a target detection task while we recorded EEG. We experimentally manipulated participants' decision criterion for reporting targets using different stimulus-response reward contingencies, inducing either a liberal or a conservative bias. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that a liberal strategy biased sensory evidence accumulation toward target-present choices. Moreover, a liberal bias resulted in stronger midfrontal pre-stimulus 2-6 Hz (theta) power and suppression of pre-stimulus 8-12 Hz (alpha) power in posterior cortex. Alpha suppression in turn was linked to the output activity in visual cortex, as expressed through 59-100 Hz (gamma) power. These findings show that observers can intentionally control cortical excitability to strategically bias evidence accumulation toward the decision bound that maximizes reward.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSensationAlpha RhythmBiasElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityPhotic StimulationTask Performance and AnalysisTheta RhythmTime FactorsVisual CortexYoung Adultdecision biasdrift diffusion modelingelectroencephalographyhumanneural excitabilityneural oscillationsneuroscienceperceptual decision-making

Identifiers

PMID30724733
PMCPMC6365056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.