Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30724732›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Rapid task-dependent tuning of the mouse olfactory bulb.

Anzhelika Koldaeva, Andreas T Schaefer, Izumi Fukunaga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dense and Persistent Odor Representations in the Olfactory Bulb of Awake Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Generation and Characterization of a Cell Type-Specific, Inducible Cre-Driver Line to Study Olfactory Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Plasticity in olfactory bulb circuits.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anzhelika KoldaevaSensory and Behavioural Neuroscience Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.
Andreas T SchaeferNeurophysiology of Behaviour Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4677-8788
Izumi FukunagaSensory and Behavioural Neuroscience Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1860-5377
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E023738/1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SPP 1392Medical Research Council MC_UP_1202/5Wellcome Trust 110174/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust FC001153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adapting neural representation to rapidly changing behavioural demands is a key challenge for the nervous system. Here, we demonstrate that the output of the primary olfactory area of the mouse, the olfactory bulb, is already a target of dynamic and reproducible modulation. The modulation depends on the stimulus tuning of a given neuron, making olfactory responses more discriminable through selective amplification in a demand-specific way.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalMiceNeuronsOdorantsOlfactory BulbSmelldynamic modulationmouseneuroscienceolfactory bulbtask switching

Identifiers

PMID30724732
PMCPMC6365054
OpenAlexW2952721993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.