Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30724573›Full record

ArticleJournal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology2019

Rating of the Effectiveness of 26 Psychiatric and Seizure Medications for Autism Spectrum Disorder: Results of a National Survey.

Devon M Coleman, James B Adams, Amy L Anderson, Richard E Frye

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Efficacy of Guanfacine for Self-injurious and Aggressive Behaviors through the Reduction of Impulsivity in Borderline Personality Disorder: Two Case Reports and a Literature Review.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. The Effects of a 16-Week School-Based Exercise Program on Anxiety in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Immune Dysregulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Do We Know about It?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy for Social Adaptability in Autistic Adults.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Devon M Coleman1 Arizona State University, Autism/Asperger's Research Program, Tempe, Arizona.
James B Adams1 Arizona State University, Autism/Asperger's Research Program, Tempe, Arizona.
Amy L Anderson1 Arizona State University, Autism/Asperger's Research Program, Tempe, Arizona.
Richard E Frye2 Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Arizona State University · USBarrow Neurological Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to provide an evaluation of the benefits and adverse effects (AEs) of psychiatric and seizure medications commonly used for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

methodsAs part of the National Survey on Treatment Effectiveness for Autism, we report ratings of 26 psychiatric and seizure medications by 505 participants. Each medication was rated with a standardized scale for overall benefits, overall AEs, and specific symptoms affected. The frequency of use and net perceived benefit (overall benefit minus overall AE) are reported.

resultsMost medications were rated as having a slightly greater benefit than AE. Six medications (lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, clonidine, guanfacine, buspirone, and sertraline) had benefit ratings that were more than twice their adverse rating. Conversely, some medications had slightly negative net benefit ratings (worse AEs than benefits on average), including Adderall, Paroxetine, Quetiapine, Olanzapine, and Topiramate. However, there were wide variations in individual ratings of benefit and AEs, suggesting that clinical response to medications was highly variable, so these scores simply represent averages. A ranking of the top medications (those with the highest net perceived benefit) for each of 18 different symptoms is provided, which may provide some clinical guidance as to which medications may be most worth considering for a given symptom. A comparison of the survey results with the results of clinical trials shows generally good agreement in terms of medication benefits with some differences; in some cases the differences are because the clinical trials did not assess all of the symptoms assessed by this survey.

conclusionsIt is hoped that physicians and their patients will find the survey results useful in selecting the most promising medications for a given symptom, and also for monitoring for likely benefits and AEs, especially for medications for which few or no studies have been carried out in ASD populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnticonvulsantsAutism Spectrum DisorderChildFemaleHumansMalePsychotropic DrugsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsPsychotropic Drugsautism spectrum disordersmedicationsonline surveypsychiatric medicationsseizure medications

Identifiers

PMID30724573
PMCPMC6442266
OpenAlexW2912990928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.