ArticleBiochemistry2019
Crowders Steal Dihydrofolate Reductase Ligands through Quinary Interactions.
Article in Biochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting purine metabolism in ovarian cancer.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Review
- Ribosome-Amplified Metabolism, RAMBO, Measured by NMR Spectroscopy.Biochemistry · 2021Article
- Enzyme dynamics: Looking beyond a single structure.ChemCatChem · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) reduces dihydrofolate (DHF) to tetrahydrofolate using NADPH as a cofactor. Due to its role in one carbon metabolism, chromosomal DHFR is the target of the antibacterial drug, trimethoprim. Resistance to trimethoprim has resulted in a type II DHFR that is not structurally related to the chromosomal enzyme target. Because of its metabolic significance, understanding DHFR kinetics and ligand binding behavior in more cell-like conditions, where the total macromolecule concentration can be as great as 300 mg/mL, is important. The progress-curve kinetics and ligand binding properties of the drug target (chromosomal E. coli DHFR) and the drug resistant (R67 DHFR) enzymes were studied in the presence of macromolecular cosolutes. There were varied effects on NADPH oxidation and binding to the two DHFRs, with some cosolutes increasing affinity and others weakening binding. However, DHF binding and reduction in both DHFRs decreased in the presence of all cosolutes. The decreased binding of ligands is mostly attributed to weak associations with the macromolecules, as opposed to crowder effects on the DHFRs. Computer simulations found weak, transient interactions for both ligands with several proteins. The net charge of protein cosolutes correlated with effects on NADP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.