ArticlePublic health nutrition2019
Understanding engagement in a family-focused, multicomponent, childhood weight management programme delivered in the community setting.
Article in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring parental and professional perceptions of weight management services among under-fives in England: A qualitative study.Obesity pillars · 2024Article
- Title: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Parental Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Management of Childhood Obesity.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe public health nurses' (PHN) experiences of referring to, and families' experiences of being referred to, a multicomponent, community-based, childhood weight management programme and to provide insight into families' motivation to participate in and complete treatment.
designQualitative study using semi-structured interviews and the draw-and-write technique.
settingTwo geographical regions in the south and west of Ireland.ParticipantsNine PHN involved in the referral process, as well as ten parents and nine children who were referred to and completed the programme, participated in the present study.
resultsPHN were afraid of misclassifying children as obese and of approaching the subject of excess weight with parents. Peer support from other PHN as well as training in how best to talk about weight with parents were potential strategies suggested to alleviate these fears. Parents recalled the anxiety provoked by the 'medical terminology' used during referral and their difficulty interpreting what it meant for the health of their child. Despite initial fears, concern for their children's future health was a major driver behind their participation. Children's enjoyment, the social support experienced by parents as well as staff enthusiasm were key to programme completion.
conclusionsThe present study identifies the difficulties of referring families to community weight management programmes and provides practical suggestions on how to support practitioners in making referrals. It also identifies key positive factors influencing parents' decisions to enrol in community weight management programmes. These should be maximised by staff and policy makers when developing similar programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.