ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2019
A prospective study of women and girls undergoing fertility preservation due to oncologic and non-oncologic indications in Sweden-Trends in patients' choices and benefit of the chosen methods after long-term follow up.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes after assisted reproductive technology in women with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Ovarian stimulation and oocyte cryopreservation in females and transgender males aged 18 years or less: a systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- The Oncology Association of Bosnia and Herzegovina's recommendations for fertility preservation in oncologic patients.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2022Guideline
- Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Acceptance and willingness-to-pay for oocyte cryopreservation in medical versus age-related fertility preservation scenarios among Swedish female university students.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Advances in the application of assisted reproductive technology in fertility preservation for female patients with malignant tumours of the reproductive systems.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Infertility, the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies use in childhood cancer survivors: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Reproductive Longevity: Innovative Approaches Beyond Hormone Replacement Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Trends and outcomes of fertility preservation in patients presenting with cancer during pregnancy or postpartum-a longitudinal observational cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Fertility preservation in girls and adolescents with Turner syndrome: lessons for reproductive care in differences of sex development - a mini-review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Article
- Effect of Geospatial and Sociodemographic Factors on Live Birth After Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Breast and Gynecologic Cancers.O&G open · 2025Article
- Experiencing fertility preservation in adolescence - a qualitative interview study indicating gender disparities in AYAs diagnosed with cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The complexity and challenges of fertility preservation in women with cervix cancer-A prospective cohort study reporting on reproductive outcome and overall survival.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Observational
- Return rates for the use of ovarian tissue cryopreserved prior to gonadotoxic treatment as fertility preservation: a systematic review.Human reproduction open · 2025Article
- Clinical and ethical perspectives of ovarian stimulation and oocyte cryopreservation in adolescents: 6 years experience from a tertiary centre.Human reproduction open · 2025Article
- Outcomes of female fertility preservation with cryopreservation of oocytes or embryos in the Netherlands: a population-based study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Observational
- Female fertility preservation for family planning: a position statement of the Italian Society of Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive Medicine (SIFES-MR).Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Review
- Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation versus Other Fertility Techniques for Chemoradiation-Induced Premature Ovarian Insufficiency in Women: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn Scandinavian countries, programs for fertility preservation are offered free of charge at tertiary-care university hospitals to all patients facing treatments with risk of subsequent sterility. In this prospective study we aimed to investigate trends in female patients' choices after counseling and fertility preservation outcomes during follow up in relation to benign vs malignant indications. MATERIAL AND
methodsData on 1254 females including 1076 adults and 178 girls who received fertility preservation counseling for either oncologic (n = 852) or benign indications (n = 402) at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, between 1 October 1998 and 1 December 2018 were analyzed. As appropriate, t tests and chi-square tests were used to compare groups. Logistic regression was used to compare outcomes among groups depending on indications.
resultsAdult women generally elected to undergo oocyte retrieval after controlled ovarian stimulation for cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes (n = 538, 73%), whereas a minor proportion opted for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue retrieved through laparoscopy (n = 221, 27%). More than half of the women with a partner chose either not to fertilize their oocytes aiming at cryopreservation of oocytes or to share obtained oocytes attempting both cryopreservation of oocytes and cryopreservation of embryos. All pre-pubertal (n = 48) and 73% of post-pubertal girls (n = 66) elected cryopreservation of ovarian tissue. In recent years, an increasing number of teenagers have opted for controlled ovarian stimulation aiming at cryopreservation of oocytes, either before (n = 24, 17%) or after completion of cancer treatment (n = 15, 10%). During follow up, 27% of the women returned for a new reproductive counseling, additional fertility preservation or to attempt pregnancy. Utilization rates among individuals who were alive and of childbearing age by December 2018 indicated 29%, 8% and 5% for embryos, oocytes and ovarian tissue with live birth rates of 54%, 46% and 7%, respectively. Women with benign indications were significantly younger than women with previous malignant indications at the time of attempting pregnancy. Although the pregnancy rates were similar among both groups, the live birth rate was significantly higher in women with benign vs previous malignant indications (47% vs 21%, P = .002).
conclusionsTrends in fertility preservation choices have changed over time. Women with previous malignancy had lower live birth rates than women with benign fertility preservation indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.