Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30723799›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2018

Delivering integrated hypertension care at private health facilities in urban Pakistan: a process evaluation.

Muhammad Amir Khan, John D Walley, Nida Khan, Muhammad Ahmar Khan, Saima Ali, Rebecca King, Shaheer Ellahi Khan, Faisal Imtiaz Sheikh, Farooq Manzoor, Haroon Jehangir Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. May Measurement Month 2018: an analysis of blood pressure screening results from PakistanEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Muhammad Amir KhanChief Coordinating Professional, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
John D WalleyProfessor of International Public Health, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nida KhanProject Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ahmar KhanResearch Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Saima AliResearch Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Rebecca KingLecturer, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Shaheer Ellahi KhanAssistant Professor, Humanities and Social Sciences Department, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Faisal Imtiaz SheikhResearch Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Farooq ManzoorProvincial Manager, Non-Communicable Disease Control Program, Lahore, Pakistan.
Haroon Jehangir KhanDirector, NCD & Mental Health, Directorate General of Health Services, Punjab, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Pakistan about 18% of all adults are affected by hypertension, and only one in eight of the prevalent cases have their hypertension controlled. As in many other low-middle income countries, a public-private partnership approach is being considered for delivering non-communicable disease care in urban areas.

aimThis process evaluation was undertaken to understand how an integrated care intervention was experienced by the care providers and patients, and to inform modifications before possible scaling. DESIGN &

settingThe mixed-methods study was conducted as part of a cluster randomised trial on integrated hypertension care at 26 private clinics.

methodThe care practices were assessed by analysing the clinical records of 1138 registered patients with hypertension. Then semi-structured interviews with service providers and patients were used to understand their respective care experiences. A framework approach was applied to analyse and interpret the qualitative data.

resultsDistrict-led objective selection and context-sensitive staff training helped to get the clinics engaged in partnership working. About one-third of patients with hypertension had associated diabetes or renal compromise. The prescription of drugs is influenced by multiple non-clinical considerations of providers and patients. Many doctors allowed the use of home-based remedies as supplements to the prescribed allopathic drugs. Female patients faced more challenges in managing lifestyle changes. The intervention improved adherence to follow-up visits, but patient attrition remained a challenge.

conclusionThe integrated hypertension care intervention at private clinics is feasible, and leads to improved diagnosis and treatment in low-income country urban setting. The authors recommend continued implementation research and informed scaling of hypertension care at private clinics.

Indexed as

general practicehypertensionIntegrated care packagemixed methods researchprimary health careprivate clinics

Identifiers

PMID30723799
PMCPMC6348318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.