Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30723722›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2018

Canine Olfactory Thresholds to Amyl Acetate in a Biomedical Detection Scenario.

Astrid R Concha, Claire M Guest, Rob Harris, Thomas W Pike, Alexandre Feugier, Helen Zulch, Daniel S Mills

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Olfaction in Dogs: Evolution, Biology, and Human-Oriented Work.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effectiveness of marker training for detection dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  12. Scent Detection Threshold of Trained Dogs toAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Use of a habituation-dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Astrid R ConchaAnimal Scent Detection Consultancy and Research, Santiago, Chile.
Claire M GuestMedical Detection Dogs, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Rob HarrisMedical Detection Dogs, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Thomas W PikeSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Alexandre FeugierRoyal Canin SAS, Aimargues, France.
Helen ZulchSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Daniel S MillsMedical Detection Dogs, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
University of Lincoln · GBDogs Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs' abilities to respond to concentrations of odorant molecules are generally deemed superior to electronic sensors. This sensitivity has been used traditionally in many areas; but is a more recent innovation within the medical field. As a bio-detection sensor for human diseases such as cancer and infections, dogs often need to detect volatile organic compounds in bodily fluids such as urine and blood. Although the limits of olfactory sensitivity in dogs have been studied since the 1960s, there is a gap in our knowledge concerning these limits in relation to the concentration of odorants presented in a fluid phase. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate olfactory detection thresholds to an inert substance, amyl acetate presented in a liquid phase. Ten dogs were trained in a "Go/No go" single scent-detection task using an eight-choice carousel apparatus. They were trained to respond to the presence of solutions of amyl acetate diluted to varying degrees in mineral oil by sitting in front of the positive sample, and not responding to the 7 other control samples. Training and testing took place in an indoor room with the same handler throughout using a food reward. After 30 weeks of training, using a forward chaining technique, dogs were tested for their sensitivity. The handler did not assist the dog during the search and was blind to the concentration of amyl acetate tested and the position of the target in the carousel. The global olfactory threshold trend for each dog was estimated by fitting a least-squares logistic curve to the association between the proportion of true positives and amyl acetate concentration. Results show an olfactory detection threshold for fluid mixtures ranging from 40 parts per billion to 1.5 parts per trillion. There was considerable inter-dog difference in sensitivity, even though all dogs were trained in the same way and worked without the assistance of the handler. This variation highlights factors to be considered in future work assessing olfactory detection performance by dogs.

Indexed as

accuracyamyl acetatedetectionolfactory thresholdssensitivity

Identifiers

PMID30723722
PMCPMC6350102
OpenAlexW2914915118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.