ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2018
Canine Olfactory Thresholds to Amyl Acetate in a Biomedical Detection Scenario.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Canine "Sniffin' Sticks" enable behavioural olfactometry to complement neurological examination in dogs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Investigation of the Impact of Extraneous Odours on the Detection Capability of Explosive Detection Dogs Under a Controlled Test Environment.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Evaluating effects of aging on dog olfactory performance.GeroScience · 2026Article
- The Role of Olfaction in Dogs: Evolution, Biology, and Human-Oriented Work.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Odour learning concentration influences concentration range of conditioned response in newborn rabbits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sensing Dog Brain Reactions to Smell by AI Speckle Pattern Analysis.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- Article
- Editorial: Veterinary rhinology and emerging insights in olfaction.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Article
- Canine olfactory detection of florfenicol residues in goat milk: a pilot study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of marker training for detection dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Scent Detection Threshold of Trained Dogs toAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- A canine model to evaluate the effect of exercise intensity and duration on olfactory detection limits: the running nose.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Article
- A novel task of canine olfaction for use in adult and senior pet dogs.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The use of mantrailing dogs in police and judicial context, future directions, limits and possibilities - A law review.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Review
- Nasal anatomy and sniffing in respiration and olfaction of wild and domestic animals.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Use of a habituation-dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2022Article
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Canine Olfaction: A Pilot Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Using Canine Olfaction to Detect Bovine Respiratory Disease: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Expert considerations and consensus for using dogs to detect human SARS-CoV-2-infections.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dogs' abilities to respond to concentrations of odorant molecules are generally deemed superior to electronic sensors. This sensitivity has been used traditionally in many areas; but is a more recent innovation within the medical field. As a bio-detection sensor for human diseases such as cancer and infections, dogs often need to detect volatile organic compounds in bodily fluids such as urine and blood. Although the limits of olfactory sensitivity in dogs have been studied since the 1960s, there is a gap in our knowledge concerning these limits in relation to the concentration of odorants presented in a fluid phase. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate olfactory detection thresholds to an inert substance, amyl acetate presented in a liquid phase. Ten dogs were trained in a "Go/No go" single scent-detection task using an eight-choice carousel apparatus. They were trained to respond to the presence of solutions of amyl acetate diluted to varying degrees in mineral oil by sitting in front of the positive sample, and not responding to the 7 other control samples. Training and testing took place in an indoor room with the same handler throughout using a food reward. After 30 weeks of training, using a forward chaining technique, dogs were tested for their sensitivity. The handler did not assist the dog during the search and was blind to the concentration of amyl acetate tested and the position of the target in the carousel. The global olfactory threshold trend for each dog was estimated by fitting a least-squares logistic curve to the association between the proportion of true positives and amyl acetate concentration. Results show an olfactory detection threshold for fluid mixtures ranging from 40 parts per billion to 1.5 parts per trillion. There was considerable inter-dog difference in sensitivity, even though all dogs were trained in the same way and worked without the assistance of the handler. This variation highlights factors to be considered in future work assessing olfactory detection performance by dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.