ArticlePreventive medicine reports2019
Quitline treatment dose predicts cessation outcomes among safety net patients linked with treatment via Ask-Advise-Connect.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07073898 (Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Scoping Review and Meta-analysis of the Use of Remote Biochemical Verification Methods of Smoking Status in Tobacco Research.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Pooled it
- Conversational Chatbot for Cigarette Smoking Cessation: Results From the 11-Step User-Centered Design Development Process and Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Trial
- Trial
- An EHR-automated and theory-based population health management intervention for smoking cessation in diverse low-income patients of safety-net health centers: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Translational behavioral medicine · 2022Trial
- Type of Social Support for Smoking Cessation Among Low-Income Postpartum Women.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of a Rheumatology Clinic Protocol on Tobacco Cessation Quit Line Referrals.Arthritis care & research · 2022Article
- A Study Protocol for Increasing Access to Smoking Cessation Treatments for Low-Income Minority Smokers.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- 12-Month Evaluation of an EHR-Supported Staff Role Change for Provision of Tobacco Cessation Care in 8 Primary Care Safety-Net Clinics.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Quitting the quitline: a qualitative study of patient experience of electronic referrals to quitlines.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Ask-Advise-Connect: Differential Enrollment and Smoking Cessation Outcomes Between Primary Care Patients Who Received Quitline-Delivered Treatment in Spanish vs English.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy of tobacco treatment delivered by state quitlines in diverse populations is well-supported, yet little is known about associations between treatment dose and cessation outcomes following the implementation of Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC), an electronic health record-based systematic referral process that generates a high volume of proactive calls from the state quitline to smokers. The current study is a secondary analysis of a 34-month implementation trial evaluating ACC in 13 safety-net clinics in Houston, TX. Treatment was delivered by a quitline and comprised up to five proactive, telephone-delivered multi-component cognitive-behavioral treatment sessions. Associations between treatment dose and abstinence were examined. Abstinence was assessed by phone six months after treatment enrollment, and biochemically confirmed via mailed saliva cotinine. Among smokers who enrolled in treatment and agreed to follow-up (n = 3704), 29.2% completed no treatment sessions, 35.5% completed one session, 16.4% completed two sessions, and 19.0% completed ≥three sessions. Those who completed one (vs. no) sessions were no more likely to report abstinence (OR: 0.98). Those who completed two (vs. no) sessions were nearly twice as likely to report abstinence (OR: 1.83). Those who completed ≥three (vs. no) sessions were nearly four times as likely to report abstinence (OR: 3.70). Biochemically-confirmed cessation outcomes were similar. Most smokers received minimal or no treatment, and treatment dose had a large impact on abstinence. Results highlight the importance of improving engagement in evidence-based treatment protocols following enrollment. Given that motivation to quit fluctuates, systematically offering enrollment to all smokers at all visits is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.