Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30723517›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2019

A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Combining Therapy with Traditional Chinese Medicine-Based Psychotherapy and Chinese Herbal Medicine for Menopausal Women with Moderate to Serious Mood Disorder.

Yuyan Zeng, Xuchun Huang, Changqian Chen, Guangning Nie, Xiaojing Cao, Jiju Wang, Xiaoyun Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yuyan ZengDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Xuchun HuangDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Changqian ChenChina Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Zhuhai, Zhuhai 510120, China.
Guangning NieDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Xiaojing CaoDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Jiju WangThe Second Clinical Medicine School of Guangzhou University of Chinese, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Xiaoyun WangDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7100-7221
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNGuangzhou University · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNZhuhai Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo comparatively examine the effectiveness and safety of the combination therapy of traditional Chinese medicine formula Bushen-Shugan granule and psychotherapy (BSSG-P) and Chinese herbal medicine Bushen-Shugan granule (BSSG) alone in the treatment of moderate to serious mood disorder in menopausal women.

methodsIn our previous clinical studies, BSSG-P had been proved to be superior to BSSG, psychological treatment, and placebo in improving mild mood disorder in menopausal women. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of BSSG-P and BSSG in the treatment of moderate to serious mood disorder. Eighty-five eligible participants, who were diagnosed as menopausal women with moderate to serious mood disorder and categorized as kidney deficiency and liver-qi stagnation pattern, were randomly assigned into two groups and treated with BSSG-P or BSSG. They were subjected to an 8-week treatment period and a 4-week follow-up study. The primary outcome instrument was the Greene Climacteric Scale, Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), respectively.

resultsWhen comparing all time points with baseline, both BSSG-P and BSSG markedly decreased the total score of Greene, SDS, and SAS and the score of each dimension, in which BSSG-P exerted superior effect after 8-week treatment and 4-week follow-up (

conclusionsBSSG-P was superior to BSSG in improving the physical and psychological symptoms of menopausal women with mood disorder. For patients with moderate mood disorder, BSSG-P showed obvious advantages; however, no superiority was observed for serious mood disorder.

Identifiers

PMID30723517
PMCPMC6339727
OpenAlexW2906830531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.