Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30723433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2018

Evaluation of Flexible and Integrative Psychiatric Treatment Models in Germany-A Mixed-Method Patient and Staff-Oriented Exploratory Study.

Sebastian von Peter, Yuriy Ignatyev, Jakob Johne, Sonja Indefrey, Onur Alp Kankaya, Burkhard Rehr, Manfred Zeipert, Andreas Bechdolf, Thomas Birkner, Arno Deister and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian von PeterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Yuriy IgnatyevDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Jakob JohneDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sonja IndefreyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Onur Alp KankayaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Burkhard RehrDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Manfred ZeipertDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Andreas BechdolfDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vivantes Krankenhaus am Urban, Charité University Medicine Berlin, University of Cologne, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas BirknerDepartment for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Westklinikum Heide, Heide, Germany.
Arno DeisterPsychosoziales Zentrum Itzehoe, Itzehoe, Germany.
Annette DuveDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vitos Klinikum Riedstadt, Riedstadt, Germany.
Sandeep RoutDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vivantes Krankenhaus Neukölln, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Harald ScherkDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vitos Klinikum Riedstadt, Riedstadt, Germany.
Anna Schulz-DuboisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Imland Krankenhaus Rendsburg, Rendsburg, Germany.
Bettina WilmsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Basedow Klinikum Saalekreis, Querfurt, Germany.
Dyrk ZedlickDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Rudolf Virchow Krankenhaus Glauchau, Glauchau, Germany.
Peter GrollichDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Bernard BraunSOCIUM Research Center, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Jürgen TimmBiometry Section, Competence Center for Clinical Trials, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Martin HeinzeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Bremen · DEVitos · DEInstitut für Berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung · DEKlinikum Itzehoe · DEVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrary to the practice in some countries, access to flexible and integrated forms of psychiatric care (FIT models) is limited in Germany. Several legislations have been introduced to improve this situation, notably the recent §64b (flexible and integrative treatment model; FIT64b) of the German Social Code, which allows for a capitation-based accounting of fees for services. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of FIT64b implementation on various stakeholders (patients, informal caregivers and staff) in 12 psychiatric hospital departments across Germany. Structural as well as quantitative and qualitative data are included, with integration of different methodological approaches. In all departments, the implementation of the new accounting system resulted into a relatively stable set of structural and processual changes where rigid forms of mainly inpatient care shifted to more flexible and integrated types of outpatient and outreach treatments. These changes were more likely to be perceived by patients and staff, and likewise received better evaluations, in those departments showing higher level or longer duration of implementation. Patients' evaluations, furthermore, were largely influenced by the advent of continuous forms of care, better accessibility, and by their degree of autonomy in steering of their services.

Indexed as

block contractcapitationcross sectoral mental health careimplementationmixed methodregional budgetstaff evaluationuser evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30723433
PMCPMC6349706
OpenAlexW2911733069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.