Observational studyPediatric research2019
Body fat indicators perform better than body mass index in identifying abnormal lipid profiles in boys but not in girls.
Observational study in Pediatric research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percent body fat, but not body mass index, is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2023Article
- [Value of body fat mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis in predicting abnormal blood pressure and abnormal glucose metabolism in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBMI as a body weight indicator, may inadequately represent the biological effect of body fat on lipid profiles. This study aims to assess whether body fat indicators were superior to BMI for recognizing children with dyslipidemia.
methodsA nationwide cross-sectional study involving 8944 pediatric participants aged 6-18 years. Measures of fat mass index (FMI), fat mass percentage (FMP), BMI, and four lipid profiles were obtained.
resultsAmong boys, the standard multi-linear regression coefficients of FMI for TC, LDL-C, and TG were higher than those of BMI (P < 0.01), but not for HDL-C. Also, the prevalence ratios and area under curves (AUCs) of excess fat classified by FMI for specific abnormal lipid profiles (except for HDL-C) were greater than overweight classified by BMI. The AUCs for detecting children with abnormal TC, LDL-C, and TG of FMI-based excess fat were 3.9%, 5.6%, and 2.8% higher than those of BMI-based overweight, respectively, all P < 0.01. Among girls, the associations of BMI with lipid profiles were substantially similar to FMI. All these results were almost identical when FMP was used instead of FMI.
conclusionsDXA measured body fat performs better than BMI in identifying abnormal lipid profiles in boys but not in girls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.