Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30723297›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2019

Prevalence of recurrent oncogenic fusion in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinoma with hypermethylated MLH1 and wild-type BRAF and KRAS.

Jing Wang, Yuting Yi, Yi Xiao, Lin Dong, Li Liang, Lianghong Teng, Jian Ming Ying, Tao Lu, Yuanyuan Liu, Yanfang Guan and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. JCO precision oncology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Next-generation sequencing reveals heterogeneous genetic alterations in key signaling pathways of mismatch repair deficient colorectal carcinomas.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jing WangMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuting YiGeneplus-Beijing Institute, Beijing, China.
Yi XiaoDepartment of Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lin DongDepartments of Pathology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Li LiangDepartment of Pathology, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lianghong TengDepartment of Pathology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jian Ming YingDepartments of Pathology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Tao LuMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuanyuan LiuMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yanfang GuanGeneplus-Beijing Institute, Beijing, China.
Junyi PangMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lianrui ZhouMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Junliang LuMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhiwen ZhangMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoding LiuMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaolong LiangMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xuan ZengMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xin YiGeneplus-Beijing Institute, Beijing, China.
Weixun ZhouMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xuefeng XiaHouston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Ling YangGeneplus-Beijing Institute, Beijing, China.
Jianjun ZhangDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Scott KopetzDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
P Andrew FutrealDepartment of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Huanwen WuMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. wuhuanwen10700@pumch.cn.
Zhiyong LiangMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. liangzhiyong1220@yahoo.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCapital Medical University · CNHouston Methodist · USNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncogenic fusions are rare in colorectal carcinomas, but may be important for prognosis and therapy. An effective strategy for screening targetable oncogenic fusions in colorectal carcinomas is needed. Here, we investigate molecular genetic alterations in colorectal carcinomas based on their DNA mismatch repair status, and to effectively screen for targetable oncogenic fusions in colorectal carcinomas. In this retrospective study, the initial cohort included 125 consecutive mismatch repair-deficient and 238 randomly selected mismatch repair-proficient colorectal carcinomas diagnosed between July 2015 and December 2017 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Targeted sequencing was performed. MLH1 promoter hypermethylation analysis was further employed for subgrouping dMMR colorectal carcinomas. Clinicopathological characteristics, molecular features, and survival outcome of colorectal carcinomas harboring oncogenic fusions were assessed. A multicenter cohort comprised of 227 colorectal carcinomas with dual loss of MLH1/PMS2 was used to validate the efficacy of the proposed screening strategy for oncogenic fusions. Of the 363 patients in the initial cohort, 11(3.0%) harbored oncogenic fusions and were all mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinomas with hypermethylated MLH1 and wild-type BRAF and KRAS, comprising 55% (11/20) of this subgroup. These patients with oncogenic fusions showed poorer 3-year cancer-specific survival compared with other Stage III/IV mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinoma patients (40% vs. 97%), and significantly higher CD274(PD-L1) expression in tumor cells compared with other dMMR colorectal carcinoma patients (46% vs. 6.1%, P < 0.001). An easy-to-perform and cost-efficient strategy for screening targetable fusions was proposed based on the current molecular testing algorithms for colorectal carcinomas, and validated in an independent multicenter cohort. In conclusion, oncogenic fusions were highly enriched and frequently detected in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinomas with MLH1 hypermethylation and wild-type BRAF and KRAS, and were associated with poor prognosis and high tumor CD274(PD-L1) expression.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationB7-H1 AntigenBrain NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairGene RearrangementHumansMutationMutL Protein Homolog 1Neoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryOncogene FusionPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesB7-H1 AntigenBRAF protein, humanCD274 protein, humanKRAS protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID30723297
OpenAlexW2914746101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.