Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30723256›Full record

SynthesisSpinal cord2019

Physiotherapy interventions for increasing muscle strength in people with spinal cord injuries: a systematic review.

Nisha Aravind, Lisa A Harvey, Joanne V Glinsky

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Physiotherapy process with the addition of modern technologies after cervical spinal cord arteriovenous malformation (AVM) rupture: a case study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Robotic technology (ROBERTSpinal cord series and cases · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nisha AravindJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Lisa A HarveyJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. l.harvey@usyd.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4365-0236
Joanne V GlinskyJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designA systematic review.

objectiveThe aim of this review was to determine the effectiveness of physiotherapy (PT) interventions for increasing voluntary muscle strength in people with spinal cord injuries (SCI).

methodsWe included randomised controlled trials of PT interventions for people with SCI. We were interested in two comparisons: PT interventions compared with sham or no intervention, and PT interventions compared to each other. The outcome of interest was voluntary strength of muscles directly affected by SCI. All included studies were rated according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and results of similar trials were pooled using meta-analyses where possible.

resultsTwenty-six trials met the inclusion criteria and provided useable data. A statistically significant between-group difference was found in four comparisons, namely, resistance training versus no intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.22-1.07; p = 0.003); resistance training combined with electrical stimulation versus no intervention (mean difference (MD) = 14 Nm; 95% CI, 1-27; p = 0.03); a package of PT interventions versus no intervention (MD = 4.8/50 points on the Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS); 95% CI 1.9-7.7; p = 0.01); and robotic gait training versus overground gait training (MD = 3.1/50 points on the LEMS; 95% CI, 1.3-5.0; p = 0.0008).

conclusionThere is evidence that a small number of PT interventions increase voluntary strength in muscles directly affected by SCI.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesExercise TherapyHumansMuscle StrengthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResistance TrainingSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID30723256
OpenAlexW2912460287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.