Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30723147›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Monarch butterfly and milkweed declines substantially predate the use of genetically modified crops.

J H Boyle, H J Dalgleish, J R Puzey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Environmental and economic concerns surrounding restrictions on glyphosate use in corn.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Contemporary loss of migration in monarch butterflies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Tracking trends in monarch abundance over the 20th century is currently impossible using museum records.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Monarch butterfly trends are sensitive to unexamined changes in museum collections over time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Advances in understanding the long-term population decline of monarch butterflies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J H BoyleDepartment of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187.
H J DalgleishDepartment of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187.
J R PuzeyDepartment of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187 jrpuzey@wm.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8019-9993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monarch butterfly (

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimal MigrationAnimalsAsclepiasButterfliesHerbicide ResistanceHost-Parasite InteractionsPlants, Genetically ModifiedPopulation DynamicsUnited Statesgenetically modified cropsherbariummilkweedmonarch butterflyspecimen records

Identifiers

PMID30723147
PMCPMC6386695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.