Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30722839›Full record

GuidelineDeutsches Arzteblatt international2018

Mechanical Ventilation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygena tion in Acute Respiratory Insufficiency.

Falk Fichtner, Onnen Moerer, Sven Laudi, Steffen Weber-Carstens, Monika Nothacker, Udo Kaisers, Investigators and the Guideline Group on Mechanical Ventilation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygena tion in Acute Respiratory Insufficiency

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Falk FichtnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig
Onnen MoererCenter for Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen
Sven LaudiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig
Steffen Weber-CarstensDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicin, Charité–Universitätsklinikum Berlin
Monika NothackerAWMF-Institute for Medical Knowledge Management (AWMF-IMWi), AWMF office Berlin
Udo KaisersBoard of directors, Ulm University Hospital
Investigators and the Guideline Group on Mechanical Ventilation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygena tion in Acute Respiratory Insufficiency
University of Göttingen · DEDr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals · INCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical ventilation is life-saving for patients with acute respiratory insufficiency. In a German prevalence study, 13.6% of patients in intensive care units received mechanical ventilation for more than 12 hours; 20% of these patients received mechanical ventilation as treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The new S3 guideline is the first to contain recommendations for the entire process of treatment in these groups of patients (indications, ventilation modes/parameters, ac- companying measures, treatments for refractory impairment of gas exchange, weaning, and follow-up care).

methodsThis guideline was developed according to the GRADE methods. Pertinent publications were identified by a systematic search of the literature, the quality of the evidence was evaluated, a risk/benefit assessment was conducted, and recommendations were issued by interdisciplinary consensus.

resultsMechanical ventilation is recommended as primary treatment for patients with severe ARDS. In other patient groups, non-in- vasive ventilation can lower mortality. If mechanical ventilation is needed, ventilation modes allowing spontaneous breathing seem beneficial (quality of evidence [QoE]: very low). Protective ventilation (high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume, limited peak pressure) improve the survival of ARDS patients (QoE: high). If a severe impairment of gas exchange is present, prone posi- tioning lessens mortality (QoE: high). Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) has not unequivocally been shown to improve survival. Early mobilization and weaning protocols can shorten the duration of ventilation (QoE: moderate).

conclusionRecommendations for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation include lung-protective ventilation, early sponta- neous breathing and mobilization, weaning protocols, and, for those with severe impairment of gas exchange, prone positioning. It is further recommended that patients with ARDS and refractory impairment of gas exchange should be transferred to an ARDS/ECMO center, where extracorporeal methods should be applied only after application of all other therapeutic options.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseEarly AmbulationExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationGermanyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMeta-Analysis as TopicOxygen ConsumptionPositive-Pressure RespirationProne PositionPulmonary Gas ExchangeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory InsufficiencyTidal Volume

Identifiers

PMID30722839
PMCPMC6375070
OpenAlexW2904407615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.