Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30722059›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-oral Lefamulin, a Pleuromutilin Antibiotic, for the Treatment of Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia: The Phase III Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP 1) Trial.

Thomas M File, Lisa Goldberg, Anita Das, Carolyn Sweeney, John Saviski, Steven P Gelone, Elyse Seltzer, Susanne Paukner, Wolfgang W Wicha, George H Talbot and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02559310 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lefamulin), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02559310 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lefamulin (BC 3781) Versus Moxifloxacin (With or Without Adjunctive Linezolid) in Adults With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorNabriva Therapeutics AGRan2015 to 2017Enrolled551ConditionsCommunity Acquired PneumoniaArmslefamulin, Moxifloxacin, Linezolid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Static vs. cidal: it's not complex; it's simply incorrect.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas M FileSumma Health, Akron, Ohio.
Lisa GoldbergNabriva Therapeutics US, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Anita DasDas Consulting, Guerneville, California.
Carolyn SweeneyNabriva Therapeutics US, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
John SaviskiNabriva Therapeutics US, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Steven P GeloneNabriva Therapeutics US, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Elyse SeltzerUrogen Pharma, New York.
Susanne PauknerNabriva Therapeutics GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang W WichaNabriva Therapeutics GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
George H TalbotTalbot Advisors LLC, Anna Maria, Florida.
Leanne B GasinkNabriva Therapeutics US, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLefamulin, a pleuromutilin antibiotic, is active against pathogens commonly causing community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP 1) study was a global noninferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lefamulin for the treatment of CABP.

methodsIn this double-blind study, adults with CABP of Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team risk class ≥III were randomized 1:1 to receive lefamulin at 150 mg intravenously (IV) every 12 hours or moxifloxacin at 400 mg IV every 24 hours. After 6 doses, patients could be switched to an oral study drug if prespecified improvement criteria were met. If methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was suspected, either linezolid or placebo was added to moxifloxacin or lefamulin, respectively. The US Food and Drug Administration primary endpoint was an early clinical response (ECR) 96 ± 24 hours after the first dose of the study drug in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (noninferiority margin, 12.5%). The European Medicines Agency co-primary endpoints were an investigator assessment of clinical response (IACR) 5-10 days after the last dose of the study drug in the modified ITT (mITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations (noninferiority margin, 10%).

resultsThere were 551 patients randomized (n = 276 lefamulin; n = 275 moxifloxacin). Lefamulin was noninferior to moxifloxacin for ECR (87.3% vs 90.2%, respectively; difference -2.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] g -8.5 to 2.8) and IACR (mITT, 81.7% vs 84.2%, respectively; difference -2.6%, 95% CI -8.9 to 3.9; CE, 86.9% vs 89.4%, respectively; difference -2.5%, 95% CI -8.4 to 3.4). Rates of study drug discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events were 2.9% for lefamulin and 4.4% for moxifloxacin.

conclusionsLefamulin was noninferior to moxifloxacin for the primary efficacy endpoints and was generally safe and well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02559310.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiterpenesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLinezolidMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMoxifloxacinPleuromutilinsPneumonia, BacterialPolycyclic CompoundsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiterpeneslefamulinLinezolidMoxifloxacinPleuromutilinsPolycyclic CompoundsThioglycolatesantibioticlefamulinmoxifloxacinpleuromutilinpneumonia

Identifiers

PMID30722059
PMCPMC6853694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.